Cited by 9Spaceflight effects on biologyCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Cardiovascular regulation during body unweighting by lower body positive pressure

Evans, Joyce M., Mohney, Lindsay, Wang, Siqi, Moore, Rachel K., Elayi, Samy-Claude, Stenger, Michael B., Moore, Fritz B., Knapp, Charles F.·2013·Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that human cardiovascular responses to standing in reduced gravity environments, as on the Moon or Mars, could be modeled using a lower body positive pressure (LBPP) chamber. METHODS: Heart rate, blood pressure, body segment fluid shifts, ECG, indexes of sympathetic, parasympathetic balance, and baroreflex control of the heart and periphery plus echocardiographic measures of cardiac function were recorded from seven men and seven women supine and standing at 100% (Earth), 40% (-Mars), and 20% (-Moon) bodyweights (BW). RESULTS: The fluid shifted from the chest was greater when standing at 100% BW than at 20% and 40% BW, while fluid pooled in the abdomen was similar at all BWs. Compared to moving from supine to standing at 100% BW, moving to 20% and 40% BW resulted in smaller decreases in stroke volume and pulse pressure, smaller increases in heart rate and smaller decreases in parasympathetic control of heart rate, baroreflex slope, numbers of blood pressure ramps, and much reduced indexes of sympathetic drive to the heart and periphery. However, peripheral vascular resistance, systolic pressure, and baroreflex effectiveness were elevated during 20% and 40% BW, compared to supine and standing at 100% BW. DISCUSSION: Standing at reduced bodyweight suppressed indexes of sympathetic control of heart rate and peripheral vasomotion. Regulatory responses indicated a combination of arterial and cardiopulmonary baroreflex control: mean heart rate, vasomotion, and baroreflex sensitivity appeared to be more under cardiopulmonary control while baroreflex effectiveness appeared to be driven more by the arterial baroreflex.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3357/asem.3576.2013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Evans, J. M., Mohney, L., Wang, S., Moore, R. K., Elayi, S.-C., Stenger, M. B., Moore, F. B., & Knapp, C. F.
Affiliations
University of Kentucky (US)
Venue
Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine
Published
2013-11-01
Volume
84
Issue
11
Pages
1140-1146
ISSN
  • 0001-9402 (ISSN-L)
  • 0095-6562
OpenAlex
W2329455131
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Johnson Space Center
  • Office of Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
lower body positive pressure, reduced gravity, cardiovascular regulation, standing, fluid shifts, baroreflex sensitivity, sympathetic nervous system, parasympathetic modulation, heart rate, stroke volume, systemic vascular resistance, cardiopulmonary baroreflex, arterial baroreflex, spaceflight physiology, Moon
MeSH terms
Blood Pressure, Cardiovascular System, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Space Flight, Stroke Volume, Vascular Resistance, Baroreflex, Hypogravity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review