Cited by 59Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyPasture and Agricultural SystemsCrop Yield and Soil Fertility

Maize silage for dairy cows

Open access
Kolver, E.S., Roche, J.R., Miller, D., Densley, R.·2001·Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association

Abstract

This paper reviews the use of maize silage in pastoral dairying systems in New Zealand. The evolution of dairying systems to make profitable use of maize silage and other supplementary feeds has occurred during the last decade in conjunction with an increased use of maize silage. When used within recommended levels of feeding, maize silage provides a low cost source of starch and fibre which complements pasture well for much of the year. Balancing dietary deficiencies in protein, minerals, and in some cases fibre, will optimise milksolids production at high levels of maize silage supplementation. Targets for good quality maize silage include a dry matter content of 28-35%, an energy content of 10.8 MJME/ kgDM, a protein content of 7-8%, and a pH of 3.8 to 4.5. Opportunities for further productivity gains exist through further intensification of dairying systems using high-yielding crops. Keywords: dairy cow, feed quality, maize silage, nutrition

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.33584/jnzg.2001.63.2407

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Progressing maturity of maize crop during grain-filling increases content of DM and starch, and decreases content of NDF and CP.

    “The progressing maturity of the maize crop during the grain-filling period increases the content of DM and starch, and decreases the content of NDF and CP.27,32,33”

    From Nutritive value of maize silage in relation to dairy cow performance and milk quality (2015) · cites this paper as [33]

    The ‘Crop maturity and nutrient content’ discussion says that as maize matures, DM and starch increase while whole-plant fibre and protein decrease. It does not specifically establish a decline in NDF: Table 3 reports ADF, rather than NDF, across maturity levels. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. [2]2. Bauman, D.E.; Harrell, R.J.; McGuire, M.A. 1995. Nutritional modulation of the IGF system. Proceedings of the Cornell Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufacturers 57: 198-206.
  2. [3]3. Campbell, A.G.; Bryant, A.M. 1978. Pasture constraints on dairy production. Proceedings of the Agronomy Society of New Zealand 8: 115-118.
  3. [5]5. Deane, T. 1999. The profitable use of supplementary feeds in pasture based dairy farm systems. Proceedings of the Ruakura Farmers' Conference 51: 64-77.
  4. [11]11. Kolver, E.S. 2000. Nutritional guidelines for the high producing dairy cow. Proceedings of the Ruakura Farmers' Conference 52: 17-28.
  5. [12]12. Macdonald, K.A. 1999. Determining how to make inputs increase your economic farm surplus. Proceedings of the Ruakura Farmers' Conference 51: 78-87.
  6. [15]15. Miller, D. 2000. The role and changes in the perception of maize silage in New Zealand pastoral dairy systems. Proceedings of the New Zealand Maize Conference: 51-55.
  7. [16]16. National Research Council, 1989. Nutrient require- ments of dairy cows. Sixth revised edition. National Academy of Science, Washington, DC.
  8. [17]17. Penno, J.W.; Macdonald, K.A.; Bryant, A.M. 1996. The economics of No 2 Dairy Systems. Proceedings of the Ruakura Farmers' Conference 48: 11-19.
  9. [18]18. Penno, J.W.; Kolver, E.S. 2000. Future farm systems. Proceedings of the Ruakura Farmers' Conference 52: 3-13.
  10. [20]20. Van der Poel, J. 1996. Going for high production. Proceedings of the Ruakura Farmers' Conference 48: 5-10. !

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kolver, E. S., Roche, J. R., Miller, D., & Densley, R.
Corresponding author
Kolver, E.S.
Venue
Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association
Published
2001-01-01
Pages
195-201
ISSN
  • 0369-3902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1179-4577
OpenAlex
W2493302997
Cited by
59
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association (publishedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Pasture and Agricultural Systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
Keywords
corn silage, dairy cattle, supplementary feeding, silage quality, feed quality, dairy intensification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review