The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Methanogenesis from forages fed to sheep
Open accessAbstract
Methane production has been measured from lambs fed contrasting forages. This work has been driven by the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture and to determine energy losses to methane from contrasting diets. Young ram lambs were fed either fresh ryegrass/white clover pasture, lucerne (also pelleted lucerne), sulla, chicory, red clover, Lotus pedunculatus (lotus) and mixtures of sulla and lucerne, sulla and chicory and chicory with red clover. The effects of condensed tannin (CT) in lotus on methane production were also measured. The trials were carried out indoors with sheep held in metabolism crates to enable an accurate measurement of intake and digestibility as well as methane production. Principal findings were a two-fold range in emissions from 11.5g CH4/kg dry matter intake (DMI) with lotus to 25.7g CH4/kg DMI with pasture and a 16% reduction in methane production due to the CT in lotus. This range in emissions from good quality forages represents a loss of about 7-11% of metabolisable energy and presents a clear direction for future research to better utilise the feeding value of pastures and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from agriculture. High quality perennial forages should be used where practical, and researchers need to identify plant parameters responsible for the variation in methane emissions. Research must focus on rapid passage of digesta through the rumen of grazing animals and will involve manipulation of the fibre content of grasses. Introduction of CT into diets is a likely target to reduce methane production. Improving the rapidly digestible constituents of forages is another opportunity, but difficult to target. Keywords: condensed tannins, forage quality, forages, greenhouse gases, methane emissions, sheep
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review
Beauchemin, K. A., Kreuzer, M., O'Mara, F., & McAllister, T. A. (2008) · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture · doi:10.1071/ea07199 · Cited by 1,162
Janssen, P. H. (2010) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.07.002 · Cited by 836
Pelletier, N., Pirog, R., & Rasmussen, R. (2010) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2010.03.009 · Cited by 419
Bhatta, R., Uyeno, Y., Tajima, K., Takenaka, A., Yabumoto, Y., Nonaka, I., Enishi, O., & Kurihara, M. (2009) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2008-1441 · Cited by 359
Grainger, C., Clarke, T., Auldist, M. J., Beauchemin, K. A., McGinn, S. M., Waghorn, G. C., & Eckard, R. J. (2009) · Canadian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.4141/cjas08110 · Cited by 293
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Waghorn, G. C., Tavendale, M. H., & Woodfield, D. R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association
- Publisher
- New Zealand Grassland Association
- Published
- 2002-01-01
- Pages
- 167-171
- ISSN
- 0369-3902 (ISSN-L)
- 1179-4577
- OpenAlex
- W3040528611
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methanogenesis from forages fed to sheep. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.33584/jnzg.2002.64.2462
- The paper
- Waghorn, G. C., Tavendale, M. H., & Woodfield, D. R. (2002). Methanogenesis from forages fed to sheep. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association. https://doi.org/10.33584/jnzg.2002.64.2462
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.