Cited by 359Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

Difference in the nature of tannins on in vitro ruminal methane and volatile fatty acid production and on methanogenic archaea and protozoal populations

Open access
Bhatta, R., Uyeno, Y., Tajima, K., Takenaka, A., Yabumoto, Y., Nonaka, I., Enishi, O., Kurihara, M.·2009·Journal of Dairy Science

Abstract

Six plant sources of hydrolyzable tannins (HT) or HT and condensed tannins (CT; designated as HT1, HT2, HT3, HT + CT1, HT + CT2, and HT + CT3) were evaluated to determine their effects in vitro on CH(4) production and on ruminal archaeal and protozoa populations, and to assess potential differences in biological activities between sources containing HT only or HT and CT. Samples HT1, HT2, and HT3 contained only HT, whereas samples HT + CT1, HT + CT2, and HT + CT3 contained HT and CT. In experiment 1, in vitro incubations with samples containing HT or HT + CT resulted in a decrease in CH(4) production of 0.6 and 5.5%, respectively, compared with that produced by incubations containing the added tannin binder polyethylene glycol-6000. Tannin also suppressed the population of methanogenic archaea in all incubations except those with HT2, with an average decrease of 11.6% in HT incubations (15.8, 7.09, and 12.0 in HT1, HT2, and HT3) and 28.6% in incubations containing HT + CT (35.0, 40.1, and 10.8 in HT + CT1, HT + CT2, and HT + CT3) when compared with incubations containing added polyethylene glycol-6000. The mean decrease in protozoal counts was 12.3% in HT and 36.2% in HT + CT incubations. Tannins increased in vitro pH, reduced total VFA concentrations, increased propionate concentrations, and decreased concentrations of iso-acids. In experiment 2, when a basal diet was incubated with graded levels of HT + CT1, HT + CT2, and HT + CT3, the total gas and CH4 production and archaeal and protozoal populations decreased as the concentration of tannins increased. Our results confirm that tannins suppress methanogenesis by reducing methanogenic populations in the rumen either directly or by reducing the protozoal population, thereby reducing methanogens symbiotically associated with the protozoal population. In addition, tannin sources containing both HT and CT were more potent in suppressing methanogenesis than those containing only HT.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.2008-1441

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Addition of condensed tannin extracts to the diet reduces populations of methanogenic archaea and some cellulolytic bacteria (R. flavefaciens).

    “The addition of CT extracts to the diet reduced populations of methanogenic archaea and some cellulolytic bacteria (R. flavefaciens) (201).”

    From Phytogenic Additives Can Modulate Rumen Microbiome to Mediate Fermentation Kinetics and Methanogenesis Through Exploiting Diet–Microbe Interaction (2020) · cites this paper as [201]

    The Discussion reports that incubating a basal diet with tannin sources containing both hydrolyzable and condensed tannins reduced methanogenic archaeal populations. It does not report a reduction in R. flavefaciens; the study measured total bacterial counts, which increased in one set of HT + CT incubations. Its findings are from in vitro incubation, not animals fed a diet. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bhatta, R., S. Vaithiyanathan, A. K. Shinde, and R. C. Jakhmola. 2005. Effect of feeding complete feed block containing Prosopis cineraria leaves and polyethylene glycol (PEG)-6000 on nutrient 5521 EFFECT OF TANNINS ON METHANE PRODUCTION Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 92 No. 11, 2009
  2. Hayler, R., H. Steingass, and W. Drochner. 1998. Effects of various feedstuffs rich in tannin content on rumen methanogenesis in vitro using the Hohenheim test. Proc. Soc. Nutr. Physiol. 7:35.
  3. Roth, S., H. Steingassß, and W. Drochner. 2002. Minderung von Methane emission und optimierung der N-Versorgung bei Wiederkauern durch die Behandlung von Futtermitteln mit Tanninen. Pages 181-186 in 34

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhatta, R., Uyeno, Y., Tajima, K., Takenaka, A., Yabumoto, Y., Nonaka, I., Enishi, O., & Kurihara, M.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Livestock and Grassland Science (JP)
  • National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (JP)
Corresponding author
Bhatta, R.
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2009-11
Volume
92
Issue
11
Pages
5512-5522
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2135206137
Cited by
359
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 16
FWCI
26.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • Ministry of Environment
  • Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
tannins, hydrolysable tannins, proanthocyanidins, ruminal methane, methanogenesis, methanogenic archaea, rumen protozoa, volatile fatty acids, propionate, methane mitigation, polyethylene glycol 6000, in vitro rumen fermentation, rumen pH
MeSH terms
Animals, Archaea, Cattle, Fatty Acids, Volatile, Female, Methane, Polyethylene Glycols, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Rumen, Surface-Active Agents, Tannins, Ciliophora

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review