Cited by 1Wastewater Treatment and ReuseUrban and Rural Development ChallengesChild Nutrition and Water Access

On-plot sanitation in urban areas

·1999·Waterlines

Abstract

This Technical Brief examines the key issues involved in providing sanitation to low-income urban communities. We clarify differences between on-plot and on-site systems, and discuss why people lack latrines, what users want, optimum plot size, and common operational problems and maintenance issues. The findings are based on extensive consultation with urban householders in Africa and Asia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3362/0262-8104.1999.032

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Venue
Waterlines
Published
1999-07-01
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
17-20
ISSN
  • 0262-8104 (ISSN-L)
  • 1756-3488
OpenAlex
W4232417473
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2015: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Waterlines (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban and Rural Development Challenges
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
Keywords
on-site sanitation, latrines, low-income urban communities, household sanitation, plot size, latrine maintenance, sanitation service delivery, user preferences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review