The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Charting the Digital Literary Sphere
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Similarly, as explored in Murray [90], the digital environment selects for certain types of readers and reading experiences that may systematically impact on the kinds of tweets that are produced.”
From Five studies evaluating the impact on mental health and mood of recalling, reading, and discussing fiction (2022) · cites this paper as Murray [90]
Citations
Cites
Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word
ONG, W. J. (1982) · Taylor & Francis eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203328064 · Cited by 6,996
Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide
Jenkins, H., & Plasencia, A. (2017) · Is the Universe a Hologram? · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262036016.003.0012 · Cited by 6,944
The Rise of the Creative Class
Florida, R. L. (2002) · Cited by 4,537
Mass Communication and Para-Social Interaction
Horton, D., & Richard Wohl, R. (1956) · Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049 · Cited by 4,380
The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man
Leech, G. N., & McLuhan, M. (1963) · The Modern Language Review · doi:10.2307/3719923 · Cited by 3,339
Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation
Genette, G., Macksey, R. A., & Lewin, J. E. (1997) · Cited by 2,671
The field of Cultural Production
(2002) · Understanding Bourdieu · doi:10.4135/9781446221488.n8 · Cited by 2,461
The reading nation in the Romantic period
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-3194 · Cited by 1,549
The rules of art : genesis and structure of the literary field
Bourdıeu, P., & Emanuel, S. (1997) · Jagiellonian University Repository (Jagiellonian University) · doi:10.6570/psqbr.2011.31.4 · Cited by 1,394
Hesmondhalgh, D. (2019) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781036234232 · Cited by 1,150
Cited by
Faraway, So Close: Seeing the Intimacy in Goodreads Reviews
Driscoll, B., & Sedo, D. R. (2018) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1077800418801375 · Cited by 107
Amateur Creativity: Contemporary Literature and the Digital Publishing Scene
Vadde, A. (2017) · New Literary History · doi:10.1353/nlh.2017.0001 · Cited by 63
The Global Book: Micropublishing, Conglomerate Production, and Digital Market Structures
Steiner, A. (2017) · Publishing Research Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s12109-017-9558-8 · Cited by 50
Mapping the entertainment ecosystem of Wattpad: Platforms, publishing and adaptation
Parnell, C. (2020) · Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies · doi:10.1177/1354856520970141 · Cited by 54
Algorithmic imaginings and critical digital literacy on #BookTok
Low, B., Ehret, C., & Hagh, A. (2023) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448231206466 · Cited by 31
Norrick-Rühl, C. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108597258 · Cited by 31
Taste and/or big data?: post‐digital editorial selection
Squires, C. (2017) · Critical Quarterly · doi:10.1111/criq.12361 · Cited by 30
Carney, J., & Robertson, C. (2022) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0266323 · Cited by 25
Twenty-First Century Book Studies: The State of the Discipline
Noorda, R., & Marsden, S. (2019) · Book history · doi:10.1353/bh.2019.0013 · Cited by 24
Fathallah, J. M. (2018) · Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies · doi:10.1177/1354856518806674 · Cited by 17
Benatti, F. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009319942 · Cited by 10
McAlister, J. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108900737 · Cited by 10
Soelseth, C. H. (2022) · Baltic screen media review./Baltic screen media review · doi:10.2478/bsmr-2022-0008 · Cited by 14
United We ’Gram: Scrolling through the Assimilated Aesthetics of Instapoetry
Knox, J. (2022) · Poetics Today · doi:10.1215/03335372-9780403 · Cited by 9
Hyperparatextuality: Meaning-making in the digital reading frame
Barnett, T. (2020) · Book 2 0 · doi:10.1386/btwo_00019_1 · Cited by 5
Driscoll, E. A. (2019) · Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) · Cited by 5
Weber, M., & Davis, M. (2019) · Feminist Media Studies · doi:10.1080/14680777.2019.1652667 · Cited by 5
Captivating, splendid or instructive?
Boot, P., & Koolen, M. (2020) · Scientific Study of Literature · doi:10.1075/ssol.20003.boo · Cited by 5
Crisis Book Browsing: Restructuring the Retail Shelf Life of Books
MacTavish, K. (2022) · New directions in book history · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-05292-7_3 · Cited by 3
Sheltering the dream and protecting the dreamer
Butler, C., Makri, S., MacFarlane, A., Wisdom, S., & Cooke, I. D. (2018) · Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (OzCHI) · doi:10.1145/3292147.3292172 · Cited by 3
Rare books? The divided field of reading and book culture in contemporary Australia
Kelly, M., Gayo, M., & Carter, D. (2018) · Continuum · doi:10.1080/10304312.2018.1453463 · Cited by 2
Materiality and Media: Australian Literary Journals in the Post-Digital Publishing Ecology
Smith, I. (2017) · Queensland University of Technology · doi:10.5204/thesis.eprints.107725 · Cited by 2
A Library of Fragments: Digital Quotations, New Literacies, and Attention on Social Media
Booten, K. (2017) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 2
A History of Ideas About the Author
Williams, C. (2024) · Creative working lives · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-64206-7_2 · Cited by 1
Sheryl Sandberg and Roxane Gay: The Limits and Possibilities of Contemporary Blockbuster Feminism
Taylor, A. (2016) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-37334-2_7 · Cited by 1
Joseph Anton’s Digital Doppelgänger: Salman Rushdie and the Rhetoric of Self-Fashioning
Partyka, J. (2017) · Contemporary Literature · doi:10.3368/cl.58.2.204 · Cited by 1
Representing “The Other India” in Transnational Public Spaces
Basu, M. (2020) · Recherches en Communication · doi:10.14428/rec.v51i0.58533 · Cited by 1
Twitter & world literature: The development of hashtag communities as a global writing practice
Howard-Sukhil, C. (2023) · New Techno Humanities · doi:10.1016/j.techum.2024.02.001 · Cited by 1
Azar, T. (2019) · South Asian Review · doi:10.1080/02759527.2019.1599553 · Cited by 1
Romani literature and its digital forms
Zahova, S. (2020) · Romani Studies · doi:10.3828/rs.2020.12 · Cited by 1
Weber, M. (2020) · doi:10.1002/9781118902264.ch73 · Cited by 1
Naomi Wolf: Twitter and the Transformation of a ‘Third wave’ Celebrity
Taylor, A. (2016) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-37334-2_6
Amy Poehler and Lena Dunham: Celebrity Memoirs, Comedy, and Digital Activism
Taylor, A. (2016) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-37334-2_8
Kint, P. E. A. C. (2017) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)
“A New Global Poetics?” Revisited, Ten Years on: Coming to Terms
Huk, R. (2019) · University of Toronto Quarterly · doi:10.3138/utq.88.2.14
“Sluts” and “Slaves”: The Internet and the Evolution of Fantasy in Dennis Cooper's Online Work
García-Iglesias, J. (2023) · Miscelánea A Journal of English and American Studies · doi:10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.20236878
La découvrabilité et l’écosystème du livre : vers une nouvelle conceptualisation du système‑livre1
Grenier, J. (2025) · Mémoires du livre · doi:10.7202/1122228ar
Metadata
- Authors
- MURRAY, S.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- MURRAY, SIMONE
- ORCID
- MURRAY, SIMONE
- Venue
- Contemporary Literature
- Publisher
- University of Wisconsin Press
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 311-339
- ISSN
- 0010-7484 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-9949
- OpenAlex
- W1839249262
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 88
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 5.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Contemporary Literature (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Geographic Society
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Digital Humanities and Scholarship
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Contemporary Literature and Criticism
- Keywords
- digital literature, digital humanities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
