Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 38Cultural Insights and Digital ImpactsDigital Humanities and ScholarshipContemporary Literature and Criticism

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Charting the Digital Literary Sphere

MURRAY, SIMONE·2015·Contemporary Literature
DOI 10.3368/cl.56.2.311
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3368/cl.56.2.311

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 38

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
MURRAY, S.
Affiliations
Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
MURRAY, SIMONE
ORCID
MURRAY, SIMONE
Venue
Contemporary Literature
Publisher
University of Wisconsin Press
Published
2015
Volume
56
Issue
2
Pages
311-339
ISSN
  • 0010-7484 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-9949
DOI
10.3368/cl.56.2.311
OpenAlex
W1839249262
Cited by
38
References
88
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3
FWCI
5.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Contemporary Literature (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Geographic Society
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Digital Humanities and Scholarship
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Contemporary Literature and Criticism
Keywords
digital literature, digital humanities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.