The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accuracy of Molecular Dating with the Rho Statistic: Deviations from Coalescent Expectations Under a Range of Demographic Models
Abstract
The ρ statistic is commonly used to infer chronological dates for molecular lineages, especially from mitochondrial DNA sequences obtained in anthropological contexts. Since this approach was described 12 years ago, it has been applied to estimate molecular dates in more than 200 studies, including some published in top-tier journals. However, this method has not been well evaluated, and the accuracy of dates obtained from the ρ statistic remains unknown, especially for genetic data collected from populations with complex demographic histories. Here, molecular dates inferred from ρ are compared against coalescent expectations from a range of demographic models. This exercise reveals considerable inaccuracy. Molecular dates based on ρ have a slight downward bias with large asymmetric variance and commonly exhibit substantial type I error rates, where the true age of a lineage falls outside the 95% confidence bounds derived from the variance of ρ. Furthermore, demography proves to be a strong confounding factor in estimating molecular dates accurately, especially for populations in which bottlenecks, founder events, and size changes have played important historical roles. Therefore considerable caution should be applied to inferences made from molecular dates based on the ρ statistic, many of which may be misleading and warrant considerable skepticism.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Cluster age was determined using the rho-statistic66, 67 and, because rho was shown to introduce a systematic bias68, we also used the average squared distance (ASD) estimator69, 70.”
From The Connection of the Genetic, Cultural and Geographic Landscapes of Transoxiana (2017) · cites this paper as [68]
Citations
Cites
Fenner, J. N. (2005) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.20188 · Cited by 508
Cited by
Language Phylogenies Reveal Expansion Pulses and Pauses in Pacific Settlement
Gray, R. D., Drummond, A. J., & Greenhill, S. J. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1166858 · Cited by 866
The Connection of the Genetic, Cultural and Geographic Landscapes of Transoxiana
Zhabagin, M., Balanovska, E., Sabitov, Z., Kuznetsova, M., Agdzhoyan, A., Balaganskaya, O., Chukhryaeva, M., Markina, N., Romanov, A., Skhalyakho, R., et al. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-03176-z · Cited by 39
Mitogenomics of modern Mongolic-speaking populations
Derenko, M., Denisova, G., Dambueva, I., Malyarchuk, B., & Bazarov, B. (2022) · Molecular Genetics and Genomics · doi:10.1007/s00438-021-01830-w · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Cox, M. P.
- Venue
- Human Biology
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 911-933
- ISSN
- 0018-7143
- 1534-6617
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accuracy of Molecular Dating with the Rho Statistic: Deviations from Coalescent Expectations Under a Range of Demographic Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3378/027.081.0631
- The paper
- Cox, M. P. (2009). Accuracy of Molecular Dating with the Rho Statistic: Deviations from Coalescent Expectations Under a Range of Demographic Models. Human Biology. https://doi.org/10.3378/027.081.0631