The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of Yeast Culture in Broiler Diets on Performance and Immunomodulatory Functions
Open accessAbstract
A study was conducted to evaluate the effect of supplemental yeast culture (Diamond V XP Yeast Culture; YC) in broiler diets on performance, digestibility, mucosal development, and immunomodulatory functions. One-day-old Arbor Acres chicks (n = 960) were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 dietary treatments based on corn and soybean meal and containing 0, 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 g/kg of YC in the diet for 42 d. Each treatment consisted of 12 replicates of 20 broilers each. Nutrient digestibility was determined on d 15 and 35 by total fecal collection. On d 21 and 42, 12 birds per treatment were sacrificed to evaluate gut morphology and secretory IgA. Broilers were vaccinated with Newcastle disease vaccine by eye drop on d 7 and 28 and antibody titer was determined on d 14, 21, 35, and 42. Dietary supplemental YC at 2.5 g/kg improved average daily gain and feed conversion during grower and overall periods (P ≤ 0.05). Yeast culture supplementation increased digestibility of Ca (linear and quadratic, P = 0.01) and P (linear, P = 0.01) on d 35, but did not affect (P > 0.05) protein retention and energy digestibility. Villus height to crypt depth ratios in the duodenum and jejunum (d 42) and ileum (d 21) were increased (P ≤ 0.05) in broilers fed 2.5 g/kg of YC. Yeast culture increased antibody titers to Newcastle disease virus (linear, P ≤ 0.05), serum lysozyme activity (linear and cubic, P ≤ 0.05), and IgM (linear, P ≤ 0.05) and secretary IgA concentrations in the duodenum (linear, P = 0.01). Results of this study indicate that dietary supplemental YC at 2.5 g/kg improved growth performance. Dietary YC affected immune functions, digestibility of Ca and P, and intestinal mucosal morphology of broilers. Growth performance was optimized at 2.5 g/kg of YC in the present study. Immune function could be modified with dietary YC supplementation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The effect of microbiome modulation on the intestinal health of poultry
Kogut, M. H. (2019) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.10.008 · Cited by 283
Laudadio, V., Passantino, L., Perillo, A., Lopresti, G., Passantino, A., Khan, R. U., & Tufarelli, V. (2012) · Poultry Science · doi:10.3382/ps.2011-01675 · Cited by 270
The role of direct-fed microbials in conventional livestock production
Buntyn, J. O., Schmidt, T. B., Nisbet, D. J., & Callaway, T. R. (2016) · Annual Review of Animal Biosciences · doi:10.1146/annurev-animal-022114-111123 · Cited by 75
Awais, M. M., Jamal, M. A., Akhtar, M., Hameed, M. R., Anwar, M. I., & Ullah, M. I. (2019) · Microbial Pathogenesis · doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2018.10.038 · Cited by 46
Chou, W. K., Park, J., Carey, J. B., McIntyre, D. R., & Berghman, L. R. (2017) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2017.00037 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Gao, J., Zhang, H. J., Yu, S. H., Wu, S. G., Yoon, I., Quigley, J., Gao, Y. P., & Qi, G. H.
- Venue
- Poultry Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1377-1384
- ISSN
- 0032-5791 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2120456150
- Cited by
- 418
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Yeast Culture in Broiler Diets on Performance and Immunomodulatory Functions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3382/ps.2007-00418
- The paper
- Gao, J., Zhang, H. J., Yu, S. H., Wu, S. G., Yoon, I., Quigley, J., Gao, Y. P., & Qi, G. H. (2008). Effects of Yeast Culture in Broiler Diets on Performance and Immunomodulatory Functions. Poultry Science. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00418
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.