The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of dietary inclusion of probiotic and synbiotic on growth performance, organ weights, and intestinal histomorphology of broiler chickens
Open accessAbstract
A feeding trial was conducted to investigate the effects of dietary supplementations of synbiotic and probiotic on broiler performance, carcass yield, organs weights, and histomorphological measurements of small intestine. Six hundred 1-d-old broiler chicks were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 dietary treatments for 5 wk. The dietary treatments were 1) control, 2) basal diets supplemented with synbiotic (1 kg of Biomin IMBO/ ton of the starter diets and 0.5 kg/ton of the grower diets), 3) basal diets supplemented with probiotic (1 kg of a homofermentative and a heterofermentative Lacto-bacillus sp./ton of feed). The BW, average daily weight gain, carcass yield percentage, and feed conversion rate were significantly (P < 0.05) increased by the dietary inclusion of the synbiotic compared with the control and probiotic-fed broilers. Moreover, a slight improvement in performance traits was observed in broilers fed the probiotic compared with control birds. The absolute and relative weight of spleen and thymus tended to be greater (P < 0.1) for the probiotic-supplemented group compared with the synbiotic-supplemented group. The relative liver weight was greater (P < 0.05) for probiotic-fed birds compared with synbiotic-fed birds. Additionally, the weight of small intestine was greater for either probiotic- (3.17) or synbiotic-fed birds (3.11) than the controls (2.89). Furthermore, dietary treatments influenced the histomorphological measurements of small intestinal villi. The addition of either probiotic or synbiotic increased (P < 0.05) the villus height:crypt depth ratio and villus height in both duodenum and ileum. The duodenal crypt depth remained unaffected (P > 0.05). However, the ileal crypt depth was decreased by dietary supplementations compared with control. In conclusion, synbiotic or probiotic displayed a greater efficacy as growth promoters for broilers. Furthermore, the dietary supplementations resulted in an increase in the villus height and crypt depth of intestinal mucosa of broilers. The increase in the villus height and villus height:crypt depth ratio was associated with improvement of growth performance for both synbiotic and probiotic. This indicates that the synbiotic and probiotic can be used as a growth promoter in broiler diets and can improve the gut health. These products show promising effects as alternatives for antibiotics as pressure to eliminate growth-promotant antibiotic use increases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dietary Modulation of the Human Colonic Microbiota: Introducing the Concept of Prebiotics
Gibson, G. R., & Roberfroid, M. B. (1995) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/125.6.1401 · Cited by 7,667
AFRC, R. F. (1989) · Journal of Applied Bacteriology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.1989.tb05105.x · Cited by 4,149
Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production
Patterson, J., & Burkholder, K. (2003) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/82.4.627 · Cited by 1,405
Xu, Z., Hu, C., Xia, M., Zhan, X., & Wang, M. (2003) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/82.6.1030 · Cited by 885
Mountzouris, K. C., Tsirtsikos, P., Kalamara, E., Nitsch, S., Schatzmayr, G., & Fegeros, K. (2007) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/86.2.309 · Cited by 632
Physiology and pathophysiology of intestinal absorption
Caspary, W. (1992) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/55.1.299s · Cited by 613
Stem cells in gastrointestinal epithelium: numbers, characteristics and death
Potten, C. S. (1998) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1998.0246 · Cited by 545
Jin, L. Z., Ho, Y. W., Abdullah, N., & Jalaludin, S. (1998) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/77.9.1259 · Cited by 463
Histological alterations of intestinal villi in chickens fed dried Bacillus subtilis var. natto
Samanya, M., & Yamauchi, K.-E. (2002) · Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology · doi:10.1016/s1095-6433(02)00121-6 · Cited by 385
Zulkifli, I., Abdullah, N., Azrin, N. M., & Ho, Y. W. (2000) · British Poultry Science · doi:10.1080/713654979 · Cited by 340
Cited by
Probiotics and prebiotics in animal feeding for safe food production
Gaggìa, F., Mattarelli, P., & Biavati, B. (2010) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.02.031 · Cited by 992
Zaghari, M., Zahroojian, N., Riahi, M., & Parhizkar, S. (2015) · Italian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.4081/ijas.2015.3555 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Awad, W. A., Ghareeb, K., Abdel-Raheem, S., & Böhm, J.
- Venue
- Poultry Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-56
- ISSN
- 0032-5791 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2163647236
- Cited by
- 873
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 19.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of dietary inclusion of probiotic and synbiotic on growth performance, organ weights, and intestinal histomorphology of broiler chickens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3382/ps.2008-00244
- The paper
- Awad, W. A., Ghareeb, K., Abdel-Raheem, S., & Böhm, J. (2009). Effects of dietary inclusion of probiotic and synbiotic on growth performance, organ weights, and intestinal histomorphology of broiler chickens. Poultry Science. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00244
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.