The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production
Open accessAbstract
The intestinal microbiota, epithelium, and immune system provide resistance to enteric pathogens. Recent data suggest that resistance is not solely due to the sum of the components, but that cross-talk between these components is also involved in modulating this resistance. Inhibition of pathogens by the intestinal microbiota has been called bacterial antagonism, bacterial interference, barrier effect, colonization resistance, and competitive exclusion. Mechanisms by which the indigenous intestinal bacteria inhibit pathogens include competition for colonization sites, competition for nutrients, production of toxic compounds, or stimulation of the immune system. These mechanisms are not mutually exclusive, and inhibition may comprise one, several, or all of these mechanisms. Consumption of fermented foods has been associated with improved health, and lactic acid bacteria (lactobacilli and bifidobacteria) have been implicated as the causative agents for this improved health. Research over the last century has shown that lactic acid bacteria and certain other microorganisms can increase resistance to disease and that lactic acid bacteria can be enriched in the intestinal tract by feeding specific carbohydrates. Increased bacterial resistance to antibiotics in humans has caused an increase in public and governmental interest in eliminating sub-therapeutic use of antibiotics in livestock. An alternative approach to sub-therapeutic antibiotics in livestock is the use of probiotic microorganisms, prebiotic substrates that enrich certain bacterial populations, or synbiotic combinations of prebiotics and probiotics. Research is focused on identifying beneficial bacterial strains and substrates along with the conditions under which they are effective.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular Analysis of Commensal Host-Microbial Relationships in the Intestine
Hooper, L. V., Wong, M. H., Thelin, A., Hansson, L., Falk, P. G., & Gordon, J. I. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.291.5505.881 · Cited by 2,202
McCracken, V. J., & Lorenz, R. G. (2001) · Cellular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1462-5822.2001.00090.x · Cited by 314
Cited by
Effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on human health
Markowiak, P., & Śliżewska, K. (2017) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu9091021 · Cited by 2,401
History of the Use of Antibiotic as Growth Promoters in European Poultry Feeds
Castanon, J. I. R. (2007) · Poultry Science · doi:10.3382/ps.2007-00249 · Cited by 1,256
Probiotics and prebiotics in animal feeding for safe food production
Gaggìa, F., Mattarelli, P., & Biavati, B. (2010) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.02.031 · Cited by 992
Awad, W. A., Ghareeb, K., Abdel-Raheem, S., & Böhm, J. (2009) · Poultry Science · doi:10.3382/ps.2008-00244 · Cited by 873
Mountzouris, K. C., Tsirtsikos, P., Kalamara, E., Nitsch, S., Schatzmayr, G., & Fegeros, K. (2007) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/86.2.309 · Cited by 632
Metadata
- Authors
- Patterson, J., & Burkholder, K.
- Venue
- Poultry Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 627-631
- ISSN
- 0032-5791 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2129735146
- Cited by
- 1,405
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 33.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ps/82.4.627
- The paper
- Patterson, J., & Burkholder, K. (2003). Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production. Poultry Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.4.627
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.