Shared Leadership and Organizational Resilience: A Systematic Literature Review
Open accessAbstract
For a long time, leadership has been viewed as a ‘great man’ construct where an individual has the power, qualities, and position to influence others towards the achievement of a given goal or objective. However, that has changed. Heroic leadership can no longer meet the expectations being placed on leadership. Today’s organizations are also faced with drastically changing trends and turbulent landscapes. This has emphasized the need for top-notch leadership to guarantee organizational success in an economically globalized context. There is a growing interest in leadership forms that focus more on sharing the responsibility of leadership between different individuals with different capabilities and qualities. One of these forms of leadership is shared leadership. In today’s turbulent business environment, an organization’s success is determined by its resilience through difficult times. Given that success has been linked to leadership, this systematic review aims to review the extant literature on the link between shared leadership and organizational resilience. The systematic review entailed searching relevant and reliable literature in various databases such as, Emerald, Google Scholar, APA PsycNet, Researchgate, and JSTOR using keywords (shared leadership, organization resilience, relationship, and impact of shared leadership on organizational resilience) primarily through Boolean operators. The initial search resulted in 200 articles, which were filtered using the study’s inclusion and exclusion criteria resulting in 43 articles that were reviewed in this study. They culminated into a proposed integrated model appreciating the urgency of shared leadership in today’s business environment. The review shows that the connection between shared leadership and organizational resilience has not received a lot of attention, making it a potential area for future studies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The interaction among succession planning, leadership development, and organizational memory is crucial for fostering leadership resilience, retaining knowledge, and ensuring long-term organizational success.
“According to Gichuhi [7] the interaction among these three factors is crucial for fostering leadership resilience, retaining knowledge, and ensuring long-term organizational success.”
From Ensuring leadership continuity: An integrative review of succession planning, leadership development and organisational memory (2025) · cites this paper as [7]
Cites
A meta-analysis of shared leadership and team effectiveness
Wang, D., Waldman, D. A., & Zhang, Z. (2014) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0034531 · Cited by 731 · see citing works
Leadership in applied psychology: Three waves of theory and research
Lord, R. G., Day, D. V., Zaccaro, S. J., Avolio, B. J., & Eagly, A. H. (2017) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000089 · Cited by 461 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Anos, C. (2025) · Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology · doi:10.55214/25768484.v9i5.7607 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gichuhi, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Pan Africa Christian University (KE)
- Corresponding author
- Jotham Mukundi Gichuhi
- Venue
- International Journal of Organizational Leadership
- Published
- 2021
- ISSN
- 2345-6744 (ISSN-L)
- 2383-1103
- OpenAlex
- W3197068797
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 0.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- International Journal of Organizational Leadership (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Organizational Management and Leadership
- Keywords
- shared leadership, organizational resilience, leadership models, heroic leadership, distributed leadership, turbulent business environment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review