The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Simple and Bias-Corrected Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects
Open accessAbstract
Matching estimators for average treatment effects are widely used in evaluation research despite the fact that their large sample properties have not been established in many cases.In this article, we develop a new framework to analyze the properties of matching estimators and establish a number of new results.First, we show that matching estimators include a conditional bias term which may not vanish at a rate faster than root-N when more than one continuous variable is used for matching.As a result, matching estimators may not be root-N-consistent.Second, we show that even after removing the conditional bias, matching estimators with a fixed number of matches do not reach the semiparametric efficiency bound for average treatment effects, although the efficiency loss may be small.Third, we propose a bias-correction that removes the conditional bias asymptotically, making matching estimators root-N-consistent.Fourth, we provide a new estimator for the conditional variance that does not require consistent nonparametric estimation of unknown functions.We apply the biascorrected matching estimators to the study of the effects of a labor market program previously analyzed by Lalonde (1986).We also carry out a small simulation study based on Lalonde's example where a simple implementation of the biascorrected matching estimator performs well compared to both simple matching estimators and to regression estimators in terms of bias and root-mean-squared-error. Software for implementing the proposed estimators in STATA and Matlab is available from the authors on the web.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables
Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (1996) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1996.10476902 · Cited by 4,230
Self-citationCharacterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data
Heckman, J., Ichimura, H., Smith, J., & Todd, P. (1998) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/2999630 · Cited by 2,286
Empirical Strategies in Labor Economics
Angrist, J. D., & Krueger, A. B. (1999) · Handbook of Labor Economics · doi:10.1016/s1573-4463(99)03004-7 · Cited by 1,628
The Effectiveness of Adjustment by Subclassification in Removing Bias in Observational Studies
Cochran, W. G. (1968) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2528036 · Cited by 961
Matching to remove bias in observational studies
Rubin, D. B. (1973) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529684 · Cited by 737
Rubin, D. B. (1979) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2286330 · Cited by 341
Cited by
Hainmueller, J. (2012) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpr025 · Cited by 6,026
Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects
Abadie, A., & Imbens, G. W. (2006) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00655.x · Cited by 2,908
Self-citationEfficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Using the Estimated Propensity Score
Hirano, K., Imbens, G. W., & Ridder, G. (2003) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00442 · Cited by 2,355
Self-citationHirano, K., & Imbens, G. W. (2001) · Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology · doi:10.1023/a:1020371312283 · Cited by 1,039
Self-citationTrade, Standards, and Poverty: Evidence from Senegal
Maertens, M., & Swinnen, J. F. M. (2009) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.04.006 · Cited by 935
Metadata
- Authors
- Abadie, A., & Imbens, G.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 2002-10
- OpenAlex
- W1568965934
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 6
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simple and Bias-Corrected Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/t0283
- The paper
- Abadie, A., & Imbens, G. (2002). Simple and Bias-Corrected Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/t0283
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.