Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 342

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Simple and Bias-Corrected Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects

Open access
Abadie, Alberto, Imbens, Guido·2002·National Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract

Matching estimators for average treatment effects are widely used in evaluation research despite the fact that their large sample properties have not been established in many cases.In this article, we develop a new framework to analyze the properties of matching estimators and establish a number of new results.First, we show that matching estimators include a conditional bias term which may not vanish at a rate faster than root-N when more than one continuous variable is used for matching.As a result, matching estimators may not be root-N-consistent.Second, we show that even after removing the conditional bias, matching estimators with a fixed number of matches do not reach the semiparametric efficiency bound for average treatment effects, although the efficiency loss may be small.Third, we propose a bias-correction that removes the conditional bias asymptotically, making matching estimators root-N-consistent.Fourth, we provide a new estimator for the conditional variance that does not require consistent nonparametric estimation of unknown functions.We apply the biascorrected matching estimators to the study of the effects of a labor market program previously analyzed by Lalonde (1986).We also carry out a small simulation study based on Lalonde's example where a simple implementation of the biascorrected matching estimator performs well compared to both simple matching estimators and to regression estimators in terms of bias and root-mean-squared-error. Software for implementing the proposed estimators in STATA and Matlab is available from the authors on the web.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/t0283

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 342

Metadata

Authors
Abadie, A., & Imbens, G.
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
2002-10
OpenAlex
W1568965934
Cited by
342
References
6
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simple and Bias-Corrected Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/t0283
The paper
Abadie, A., & Imbens, G. (2002). Simple and Bias-Corrected Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/t0283

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.