Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,191

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Using Randomization in Development Economics Research: A Toolkit

Open access
Duflo, Esther, Glennerster, Rachel, Kremer, Michael·2006·National Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract

This paper is a practical guide (a toolkit) for researchers, students and practitioners wishing to introduce randomization as part of a research design in the field.It first covers the rationale for the use of randomization, as a solution to selection bias and a partial solution to publication biases.Second, it discusses various ways in which randomization can be practically introduced in a field settings.Third, it discusses designs issues such as sample size requirements, stratification, level of randomization and data collection methods.Fourth, it discusses how to analyze data from randomized evaluations when there are departures from the basic framework.It reviews in particular how to handle imperfect compliance and externalities.Finally, it discusses some of the issues involved in drawing general conclusions from randomized evaluations, including the necessary use of theory as a guide when designing evaluations and interpreting results.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/t0333

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 1,191

Metadata

Authors
Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., & Kremer, M.
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
2006-12
OpenAlex
W1568247155
Cited by
1,191
References
10
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using Randomization in Development Economics Research: A Toolkit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/t0333
The paper
Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., & Kremer, M. (2006). Using Randomization in Development Economics Research: A Toolkit. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/t0333

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.