Cited by 291Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesSchool Choice and PerformanceEvaluation and Performance Assessment

General Equilibrium Treatment Effects: A Study of Tuition Policy

Open access
Heckman, James, Lochner, Lance, Taber, Christopher·1998·National Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract

This paper defines and estimates general equilibrium treatment effects. The conventional approach in the literature on treatment effects ignores interactions among individuals induced by the policy interventions being studied. Focusing on the impact of tuition policy, and using estimates from our dynamic overlapping generations general equilibrium model of capital and human capital formation, we find that general equilibrium impacts of tuition on college enrollment are an order of magnitude smaller than those reported in the literature on microeconomic treatment effects. The assumptions used to justify the LATE parameter in a partial equilibrium setting do not hold in a general equilibrium setting. Policy changes induce two way flows. We extend the LATE concept to a general equilibrium setting. We present a more comprehensive evaluation to program evaluation by considering both the tax and benefit consequences of the program being evaluated and placing the analysis in a market setting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w6426

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The system can respond in ways that undo intervention effects, if, for example, a teacher raises the curve in response to improved grades.

    “And the system can respond in ways that undo intervention effects, if, for example, a teacher raises the curve in response to improved grades”

    From The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention (2014) · cites this paper as Heckman et al. 1998

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heckman, J., Lochner, L., & Taber, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Western University (CA)
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
1998-02
Volume
88
Issue
2
Pages
381-386
OpenAlex
W2012221530
Cited by
289
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • American Economic Review (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Keywords
tuition policy, college enrollment, local average treatment effect, overlapping generations model, human capital accumulation, capital formation, program evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review