Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3,986

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Do Stock Prices Move Too Much to be Justified by Subsequent Changes in Dividends?

Open access
Shiller, Robert·1980·National Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract

An ex-post rational real common stock price series, formed as the present value of subpequent detrended real diY~dend~, ~~~ound to be a very stable and smooth series when compared with the actual detrended real stock price series.An efficient markets model which makes price the optimal forecast of the ex-post rational price is inconsistent with this data if the long-run trend of real dividends is assumed given.To reconcile the data with the efficient markets model, one must assume that the market expected real dividends deviate from their long-run trend much more than they did historically.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w0456

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 3,986

Metadata

Authors
Shiller, R.
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
1980-02
OpenAlex
W1484799109
Cited by
3,986
References
0
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do Stock Prices Move Too Much to be Justified by Subsequent Changes in Dividends? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w0456
The paper
Shiller, R. (1980). Do Stock Prices Move Too Much to be Justified by Subsequent Changes in Dividends? National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w0456

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.