Job Polarization and Jobless Recoveries
Open accessAbstract
Job polarization refers to the shrinking share of employment in middle-skill, routine occupations experienced recently, over the last 35 years.Jobless recoveries refers to the slow rebound in aggregate employment following recent recessions, despite recoveries in aggregate output.We show how these two phenomena are related.First, essentially all employment loss in routine occupations occurs in economic downturns.Second, jobless recoveries in the aggregate can be accounted for by jobless recoveries in the routine occupations that are disappearing.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most permanent job losses in middle-skill positions since the 1980s happened during recessions rather than between them.
“Jaimovich and Siu (2012), examining rebounds in job loss across occupational categories after every economic recession in the U.S. since the 1970s, find that an overwhelming proportion of permanent job loss in middle-skill positions since the 1980s occurred during periods of economic recession rather than periods between economic recessions.”
From Beyond the Great Recession: Labor Market Polarization and Ongoing Fertility Decline in the United States (2019) · cites this paper as Jaimovich and Siu (2012)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration
Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355303322552801 · Cited by 6,205 · see citing works
Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings
Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D. (2011) · Handbook of Labor Economics · doi:10.1016/s0169-7218(11)02410-5 · Cited by 3,799 · see citing works
Explaining Job Polarization: Routine-Biased Technological Change and Offshoring
Goos, M., Manning, A., & Salomons, A. (2014) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.104.8.2509 · Cited by 2,111 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Aaronson, D., E. R. Rissman, and D. G. Sullivan (2004). Can sectoral reallocation explain the jobless recovery? Economic Perspectives, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago 28 (2), 36-49.
- Acemoglu, D. (1999). Changes in unemployment and wage inequality: An alternative theory and some evidence. American Economic Review 89 (5), 1259-1278.
- Autor, D. H. and D. Dorn (2013). The growth of low skill service jobs and the polarization of the US labor market. American Economic Review 103 (5), 1553-1597.
- Autor, D. H., L. F. Katz, and M. S. Kearney (2006). The polarization of the u.s. labor market. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings 96 (2), 189-194.
- Brynjolfsson, E. and A. McAfee (2011). Race Against The Machine: How the Digital Revolution is Accelerating Innovation, Driving Productivity, and Irreversibly Transforming Employment and the Economy. Digital Frontier Press.
- Burger, J. D. and J. S. Schwartz (2018). Jobless recoveries: Stagnation or structural change? Economic Inquiry 56 (2), 709-723.
- Charles, K. K., E. Hurst, and M. J. Notowidigdo (2018). Housing booms, manufacturing decline and labour market outcomes. Economic Journal .
- Christiano, L. J. and T. J. Fitzgerald (2003). The band pass filter. International Economic Review 44, 435-465.
- Cortes, G. M. (2016). Where have the middle-wage workers gone? a study of polarization using panel data. Journal of Labor Economics 34 (1), 63-105.
- Gali, J., F. Smets, and R. Wouters (2012). Slow recoveries: A structural interpretation. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 44 (Supplement s2), 9-30.
- Goos, M. and A. Manning (2007). Lousy and lovely jobs: The rising polarization of work in Britain. Review of Economics and Statistics 89 (1), 118-133.
- Goos, M., A. Manning, and A. Salomons (2009). Job polarization in Europe. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings 99 (2), 58-63.
- Gordon, R. J. and M. N. Baily (1993). The jobless recovery: Does it signal a new era of productivity-led growth? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1993 (1), 271-316.
- Graetz, G. and G. Michaels (2017). Is modern technology responsible for jobless recoveries? American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 107 (5), 168-173.
- Groshen, E. L. and S. Potter (2003). Has structural change contributed to a jobless recovery? Current Issues in Economics and Finance, Federal Reserve Bank of New York 9 (8), 1-7.
- Koenders, K. and R. Rogerson (2005). Organizational dynamics over the business cycle: a view on jobless recoveries. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review July/August, 555-580.
- Kopytov, A., N. Roussanov, and M. Taschereau-Dumouchel (2018). Short-run pain, long-run gain? recessions and technological transformation. Journal of Monetary Economics 97, 29-44.
- Rytina, N. F. and S. M. Bianchi (1984). Occupational reclassification and changes in distribution by gender. BLS Monthly Labor Review 107 (3), 11-17.
- Schreft, S. L. and A. Singh (2003). A closer look at jobless recoveries. Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Second Quarter, 45-72.
- Stein, R. L. (1967). New definitions for employment and unemployment. Employment and Earnings and Monthly Report on the Labor Force 14 (2), 3-27.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019 · Cited by 8,727 · see citing works
Seltzer, N. (2019) · Demography · doi:10.1007/s13524-019-00790-6 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jaimovich, N., & Siu, H.
- Affiliations
- National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jaimovich, Nir
- ORCID
- Siu, Henry
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 2012-08
- OpenAlex
- W3123452044
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economic Theory and Policy
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Unemployment and Economic Growth
- Keywords
- job polarization, jobless recovery, routine occupations, job loss, economic recession, economic downturn, aggregate employment, output recovery
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review