The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multicountry, Multifactor Tests of the Factor Abundance Theory
Open accessAbstract
The Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek model predicts relationships among industry input requirements, country resource supplies, and international trade in commodities. These relationships are tested using data on twelve resources, and the trade of twenty-seven countries in 1967. The Heckscher-Ohlin propositions that trade reveals gross and relative factor abundance are not supported by these data. The Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek equations among input requirements, resource supplies, and trade are also rejected in favor of weaker models that allow technological differences and measurement errors. Copyright 1987 by American Economic Association.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimating the Dimension of a Model
Schwarz, G. (1978) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136 · Cited by 47,033
DOMESTIC PRODUCTION AND FOREIGN TRADE: THE AMERICAN CAPITAL POSITION REEXAMINED
Leontief, W. W. (1953) · Cited by 1,041
THE FACTOR PROPORTIONS THEORY: THE N?FACTOR CASE
Vanek, J. (1968) · Kyklos · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6435.1968.tb00141.x · Cited by 424
The Leontief Paradox, Reconsidered
Leamer, E. E. (1980) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260882 · Cited by 335
Self-citationSources of International Comparative Advantage: Theory and Evidence.
Maskus, K. E., & Leamer, E. E. (1985) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288576 · Cited by 261
Self-citationTHE COMMODITY COMPOSITION OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN MANUFACTURES: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS 1
LEAMER, E. E. (1974) · Oxford Economic Papers · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041294 · Cited by 187
Self-citationINTERNATIONAL COMPARISONS OF REAL PRODUCT AND ITS COMPOSITION: 1950–77
Summers, R. J., Kravis, I. B., & HESTON, A. W. (1980) · Review of Income and Wealth · doi:10.1111/j.1475-4991.1980.tb00128.x · Cited by 79
Cited by
Gravity for Dummies and Dummies for Gravity Equations
Baldwin, R., & Taglioni, D. (2006) · doi:10.3386/w12516 · Cited by 1,206
Comparative Advantage and Heterogeneous Firms
BERNARD, A. B., REDDING, S. J., & SCHOTT, P. K. (2007) · Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-937x.2007.00413.x · Cited by 958
International Trade and American Wages in the 1980s: Giant Sucking Sound or Small Hiccup?
Lawrence, R. Z., Slaughter, M. J., Hall, R. E., Davis, S. J., & Topel, R. H. (1993) · Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Microeconomics · doi:10.2307/2534739 · Cited by 667
The Effects of Domestic Environmental Policies on Patterns of World Trade: An Empirical Test
Tobey, J. A. (1990) · Kyklos · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6435.1990.tb00207.x · Cited by 558
An Account of Global Factor Trade
Davis, D. R., & Weinstein, D. E. (2001) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.91.5.1423 · Cited by 450
Metadata
- Authors
- Bowen, H., Leamer, E., & Sveikauskas, L.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 1986-05
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 791-809
- OpenAlex
- W1506361178
- Cited by
- 488
- References
- 7
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multicountry, Multifactor Tests of the Factor Abundance Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w1918
- The paper
- Bowen, H., Leamer, E., & Sveikauskas, L. (1986). Multicountry, Multifactor Tests of the Factor Abundance Theory. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w1918
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
