Cited by 31Global trade and economicsEconomics of Agriculture and Food MarketsHistorical Economic and Social Studies

Tariff Incidence: Evidence from U.S. Sugar Duties, 1890-1930

Open access
Irwin, Douglas·2014·National Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract

Direct empirical evidence on whether domestic consumers or foreign exporters bear the burden of a country's import duties is scarce.This paper examines the incidence of U.S. sugar duties using a unique set of high-frequency (weekly, and sometimes daily) data on the landed and the duty-inclusive price of raw sugar in New York City from 1890 to 1930, a time when the United States consumed more than 20 percent of world sugar production and was therefore plausibly a "large" country.The results reveal a striking asymmetry: a tariff reduction is immediately passed through to consumer prices with no impact on the import price, whereas about 40 percent of a tariff increase is passed through to consumer prices and 60 percent borne by foreign exporters.The apparent explanation for the asymmetric response is the asymmetric response of demand: imports collapse upon a tariff increase, but do not surge after a tariff reduction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w20635

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Bagwell, Kyle, and Robert W. Staiger. 2010. "The WTO: Theory and Practice." Annual Review of Economics 2, 223-56.
  2. Besley, Timothy J., and Harvey S. Rosen. 1999. "Sales Taxes and Prices: An Empirical Analysis." National Tax Journal 52, 157-78.
  3. Bickerdike, Charles F. 1906. "The Theory of Incipient Taxes." Economic Journal 16, 529-35.
  4. Borenstein, Severin, A. Colin Cameron, and Richard Gilbert. 1997. "Do Gasoline Prices Respond Asymmetrically to Crude Oil Price Changes? Quarterly Journal of Economics 112, 305-339.
  5. Broda, Christian, Nuno Limão, and David Weinstein. 2008. "Optimal Tariffs: The Evidence." American Economic Review 98, 2032-2065.
  6. Chang, W., and L. Alan Winters. 2002. "How Regional Blocs Affect Excluded Countries: The Price Effects of Mercosur." American Economic Review 92, 889-904.
  7. Dye, Alan. 1998. Cuban Sugar in the Age of Mass Production: Technology and the Economics of the Sugar Central, 1899-1929. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  8. Ellison, Sara Fisher, and Wallace P. Mullin. 1995. "Economics and Politics: The Case of Sugar Tariff Reform." Journal of Law and Economics 38, 335-366.
  9. Feenstra, Robert. C. 1989. "Symmetric Pass-Through of Tariffs and Exchange Rates under Imperfect Competition." Journal of International Economics 27, 25-45.
  10. Feenstra, Robert. C. 1995. "Estimating the Effects of Trade Policy." In Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 3, edited by G. M . Grossman and K. Rogoff. Amsterdam: North Holland.
  11. Genesove, David, and Wallace P. Mullin. 1998. "Testing Static Oligopoly Models: Conduct and Cost in the Sugar Industry, 1890-1914." RAND Journal of Economics 29, 355-377.
  12. Irwin, Douglas A. 1997. AHigher Tariffs, Lower Revenues? Analyzing the Fiscal Aspects of the >Great Tariff Debate of 1888,=@ Journal of Economic History 58, 59-72.
  13. Kreinin, Mordechai E. 1961. "Effect of Tariff Changes on the Prices and Volume of Imports." American Economic Review 51, 310-24.
  14. Ludema, Rodney D., and Anna Maria Mayda. 2014. "Do Terms of Trade Effects Matter for Trade Agreements? Theory and Evidence from WTO Countries." Quarterly Journal of Economics, forthcoming.
  15. Magee, Christopher P., and Stephen P. Magee. 2008. "The United States is a Small Country in World Trade." Review of International Economics 16, 990-1004.
  16. Marion, Justin, and Erich Muehlegger. 2011. "Fuel Tax Incidence and Supply Conditions." Journal of Public Economics 95, 1202-1212.
  17. Miron, Jeffrey A., and Christina D. Romer. 1990. "A New Monthly Index of Industrial Production, 1884-1940." Journal of Economic History 50, 321-337.
  18. Nakamura, Emi, and Dawit Zerom. 2010. "Accounting for Incomplete Pass-Through." Review of Economic Studies 77, 1192-1230.
  19. Poterba, James M. 1996. "Retail Price Reactions to Changes in State and Local Sales Taxes." National Tax Journal 49, 165-176.
  20. Winkelmann, Liliana, and Rainer Winkelmann. 1998. "Tariffs, Quotas and Terms-of-Trade: The Case of New Zealand." Journal of International Economics 46, 313-332.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Irwin, D.
Affiliations
Dartmouth College (US)
Corresponding author
Irwin, Douglas
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
2014-10
OpenAlex
W1942758002
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
Keywords
tariff incidence, sugar tariffs, tariffs, price transmission, consumer burden, foreign exporters, tariff reduction, tariff increases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review