Cited by 36Global trade and economicsGlobal Trade and CompetitivenessEconomic and Technological Innovation

Grounded by Gravity: A Well-Behaved Trade Model with Industry-Level Economies of Scale

Open access
Kucheryavyy, Konstantin, Lyn, Gary, Rodríguez-Clare, Andrés·2016·National Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract

Although economists have long been interested in the implications of Marshallian externalities (i.e., industry-level external economies of scale) for trading economies, the large number of equilibria that they typically imply has kept such externalities out of the recent quantitative trade literature.This paper presents a multi-industry trade model with industry-level economies of scale that nests a Ricardian model with Marshallian externalities as well as multi-industry versions of Krugman (1980} and Melitz (2003).The behavior of the model depends on two industry-level elasticities: the trade elasticity and the scale elasticity.We show that there is a unique equilibrium if the product of the trade and scale elasticities is weakly lower than one in all industries.The welfare analysis reveals that if this condition is satisfied then all countries gain from trade, even when the scale elasticity varies across industries.The presence of scale economies tends to lower the gains from trade except if the country specializes in industries with relatively high scale elasticities.On the other hand, scale economies amplify the gains from trade liberalization except if it leads to reallocation towards industries with relatively low scale elasticities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w22484

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kucheryavyy, K., Lyn, G., & Rodríguez-Clare, A.
Affiliations
National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
2016-08
OpenAlex
W2512765057
Cited by
36
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 1
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global Trade and Competitiveness
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Technological Innovation
Keywords
Marshallian externalities, trade elasticity, scale elasticity, uniqueness of equilibrium, gains from trade, trade liberalization, welfare analysis, Ricardian model, Krugman model, Melitz model, industrial specialization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review