The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Inter-Industry Wage Differences and Theories of Wage Determination
Open accessAbstract
Numerous studies have shown large differences in wages for apparently similar workers across industries.These findirgs pose a challenge to standard models of labor market behavior.A problem with past studies of industry wage differ- ences is that they have failed to distinguish between union and nonunion workers.Many economists may expect union workers wages to be set in a noncompetitive fashion but would be surprised if nonunion wages were.We examine the differences in wages across industries for both union and nonunion workers.We find that even after controlling for a wide range of per- sonal characteristics and geographic location large wage differences persist for both union and nonunion workers.Furthermore the premiums of union and nonunion workers are highly correlated.We review past studies which demonstrate that industry wage premiums are also highly correlated across countries and have been very similar over many decades.We present new evidence that the wages of dif- ferent occupations are highly correlated across industries --that is if any occupation in an industry is highly paid all occupations are.We also review the evidence which suggests that people who move from low to high paying industries receive a large fraction of the industry wage premium and that those who move from high to low paying industries lose the premium.Finally, we review the evidence on the correlates of industry wage differences.Quit rates, human capital vari- ables, capital labor ratios and market power measures are all positively correlated with industry wage differences individually though the data are not adequate to determine their independent contributions in multiple regression.On the basis of all the evidence we conclude that standard labor market clearing models can not easily explain all the facts.Several alternative models are discussed including efficiency wage and collective action threat models.These are found to be more consistent with the facts though some troubling problems remain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Unemployment: Macroeconomic Performance and the Labour Market
Layard, R., Nickell, S., & Jackman, R. (2005) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199279166.001.0001 · Cited by 325
Is there Discretion in Wage Setting? A Test Using Takeover Legislation
Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (1999) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2556062 · Cited by 221
Metadata
- Authors
- Dickens, W., & Katz, L.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 1987-06
- OpenAlex
- W1562965961
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 0
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inter-Industry Wage Differences and Theories of Wage Determination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w2271
- The paper
- Dickens, W., & Katz, L. (1987). Inter-Industry Wage Differences and Theories of Wage Determination. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w2271
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.