Cited by 221Labor market dynamics and wage inequalityMerger and Competition AnalysisLabor Movements and Unions

Is there Discretion in Wage Setting? A Test Using Takeover Legislation

Open access
Bertrand, Marianne, Mullainathan, Sendhil·1999·The RAND Journal of Economics

Abstract

October, 1998

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2556062

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies identifying effects of antitakeover statutes on firms largely focused on data from an earlier period during most of which such statutes did plausibly matter because incumbents did not yet have the power to maintain poison pills indefinitely.

    “It is worth noting that studies identifying some effects of antitakeover statutes on firms largely focused on data from an earlier period during most of which such statutes did plausibly matter because incumbents did not yet have the power to maintain poison pills indefinitely”

    From What Matters in Corporate Governance? (2009) · cites this paper as Bertrand and Mullainathan (1999)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

12 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S.
Affiliations
National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Venue
The RAND Journal of Economics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
535
ISSN
0741-6261 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2123968322
Cited by
221
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
FWCI
6.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The RAND Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Merger and Competition Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Labor Movements and Unions
Keywords
wage determination, takeover law, corporate acquisition, labor market regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review