The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment
Open accessAbstract
Most empirical models of investment rely on the assumption that firms are able to respond to prices set in centralized securities markets (through the "cost of capital" or "q").An alternative approach emphasizes the importance of cash flow as a determinant of investment spending, because of a "financing hierarchy," in which internal finance has important cost advantages over external finance.We build on recent research concerning imperfections in markets for equity and debt.This work suggests that some firms do not have sufficient access to external capital markets to enable them to respond to changes in the cost of capital, asset prices, or tax-based investment incentives.To the extent that firms are constrained in their ability to raise funds externally, investment spending may be sensitive to the availability of internal finance.That is, investment may display "excess sensitivity" to movements in cash flow.En this paper, we work within the q theory of investment, and examine the importance of a financing hierarchy created by capital-market imperfections.Using panel data on individual manufacturing firms, we compare the investment behavior of rapidly growing firms that exhaust all of their internal finance with that of mature firms paying dividends.We find that q values remain very high for significant periods of time for firms paying no dividends, relative to those for mature firms.We also find that investment is more sensitive to cash flow for the group of firms that our model implies is most likely to face external finance constraints.These results are consistent with the augmented model we propose, which takes into account different financing regimes for different groups of firms.Some extensions and implications for public policy are discussed at the end.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information
Stiglitz, J. E., & Weiss, A. (1981) · Columbia University · doi:10.7916/d8v12ft1 · Cited by 12,769
Cited by
Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference
Hansen, B. E. (1999) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(99)00025-1 · Cited by 5,260
The determinants and implications of corporate cash holdings
Opler, T. (1999) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-405x(99)00003-3 · Cited by 3,914
Monetary policy, business cycles, and the behavior of small manufacturing firms
Gertler, M., & Gilchrist, S. (1994) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118465 · Cited by 2,547
Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (1998) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00084 · Cited by 2,476
Endogeneity in Empirical Corporate Finance1
Roberts, M. R., & Whited, T. M. (2013) · Handbook of the Economics of Finance · doi:10.1016/b978-0-44-453594-8.00007-0 · Cited by 2,459
Metadata
- Authors
- Fazzari, S., Hubbard, R. G., & Petersen, B.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 1987-09
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 141-195
- OpenAlex
- W2341795385
- Cited by
- 4,351
- References
- 1
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w2387
- The paper
- Fazzari, S., Hubbard, R. G., & Petersen, B. (1987). Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w2387
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.