Cited by 5,260Spatial and Panel Data AnalysisEconomic Growth and ProductivityStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference

Hansen, Bruce E.·1999·Journal of Econometrics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-4076(99)00025-1

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The variable SIZE has a statistically significant threshold effect at the 1% level (Fstat = 145.09 > Crit5 = 44.3507, P-value = 0.0000 < 0.05).

    “Based on the values of Fstat, Prob, and Crit5, the results show that the variable SIZE has Fstat > Crit5 (145.09> 44.3507) and P-value = 0.0000 < 0.05, rejecting the hypothesis H0 about the nonexistence of the threshold and confirming that the threshold is statistically significant at the 1% level (Hansen, 1999).”
  • The fixed effect estimator of the panel threshold model requires that the covariates are strongly exogenous for the estimator to be consistent.

    “The panel model with threshold effects proposed by Hansen (1999) has been widely used in empirical research [78], but the fixed effect estimator of the model requires that the covariates are strongly exogenous for the estimator to be consistent.”

    From Digital financial inclusion and quality of economic growth (2023) · cites this paper as Hansen (1999)

  • The fixed effect estimator of the panel threshold model requires that the covariates are strongly exogenous for the estimator to be consistent.

    “The panel model with threshold effects proposed by Hansen (1999) has been widely used in empirical research [78], but the fixed effect estimator of the model requires that the covariates are strongly exogenous for the estimator to be consistent.”

    From Digital financial inclusion and quality of economic growth (2023) · cites this paper as [78]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hansen, B. E.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Hansen, Bruce E.
Venue
Journal of Econometrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-12
Volume
93
Issue
2
Pages
345-368
ISSN
0304-4076 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081908573
Cited by
5,260
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 718 · 2025: 673 · 2024: 641 · 2023: 605 · 2022: 557 · 2021: 406 · 2020: 321 · 2019: 225 · 2018: 178 · 2017: 111 · 2016: 111 · 2015: 96 · 2014: 103 · 2013: 99 · 2012: 75
FWCI
18.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Econometrics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Keywords
threshold regression, least squares estimation, confidence intervals, hypothesis testing, financial constraints, investment decision-making, firm-level data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review