Cited by 39Energy Efficiency and ManagementBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationBuilding energy efficiency and sustainability

Machine Learning from Schools about Energy Efficiency

Open access
Burlig, Fiona, Knittel, Christopher, Rapson, David, Reguant, Mar, Wolfram, Catherine·2017·National Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract

In the United States, consumers invest billions of dollars annually in energy efficiency, often on the assumption that these investments will pay for themselves via future energy cost reductions.We study energy efficiency upgrades in K-12 schools in California.We develop and implement a novel machine learning approach for estimating treatment effects using high-frequency panel data, and demonstrate that this method outperforms standard panel fixed effects approaches.We find that energy efficiency upgrades reduce electricity consumption by 3 percent, but that these reductions total only 24 percent of ex ante expected savings.HVAC and lighting upgrades perform better, but still deliver less than half of what was expected.Finally, beyond location, school characteristics that are readily available to policymakers do not appear to predict realization rates across schools, suggesting that improving realization rates via targeting may prove challenging.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w23908

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Burlig et al. used Lasso regression on hourly electricity consumption data from California schools to find that energy efficiency interventions fall short of expected savings.

    “For example, Burlig et al. [102] used Lasso regression on hourly electricity consumption data from schools in California to find that energy efficiency interventions fall short of the expected savings.”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [102]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burlig, F., Knittel, C., Rapson, D., Reguant, M., & Wolfram, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
2017-10
OpenAlex
W2762742523
Cited by
39
References
31
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1106400)
  • California Public Utilities Commission
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy Efficiency and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building energy efficiency and sustainability
Keywords
energy efficiency, K-12 schools, energy efficiency upgrades, electricity consumption, treatment effect estimation, HVAC upgrades, lighting upgrades, energy conservation, targeting, school characteristics, California

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review