The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Worker Knowledge of Pension Provisions
Open accessAbstract
This paper evaluates the quality of workers' information regarding pension offerings using both administrative records and worker reports of pension provisions.Missing and misinformation proves to be widespread.Unionized employees, higher income workers and those in large firms, the better educated, and those with greater seniority are better informed about their pensions.There are also demographic differences: nonwhites have less pension knowledge than whites, but women are better informed than men along several pension dimensions.Myopia about pension incentive structures is troubling since workers may save or consume suboptimally, change jobs, or retire earlier than they would have if equipped with better pension information.The prevalence of missing data should also be troubling to empirical pension analysts using data sets reporting workers' assessments of pension provisions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Why Is There Mandatory Retirement?
Lazear, E. P. (1979) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260835 · Cited by 2,038
Cited by
The (Perceived) Returns to Education and the Demand for Schooling*
Jensen, R. (2010) · Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2010.125.2.515 · Cited by 1,048
How Ordinary Consumers Make Complex Economic Decisions: Financial Literacy and Retirement Readiness
Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. (2009) · doi:10.3386/w15350 · Cited by 587
Self-citationWhat You Don't Know Can't Help You: Pension Knowledge and Retirement Decision-Making
Chan, S., & Stevens, A. H. (2008) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest.90.2.253 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Mitchell, O.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 1987-10
- OpenAlex
- W3122095789
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 1
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Worker Knowledge of Pension Provisions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w2414
- The paper
- Mitchell, O. (1987). Worker Knowledge of Pension Provisions. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w2414
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.