Cited by 588Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisFinancial Literacy and BehaviorDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

How Ordinary Consumers Make Complex Economic Decisions: Financial Literacy and Retirement Readiness

Open access
Lusardi, Annamaria, Mitchell, Olivia·2009·National Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract

This paper reports on several self-assessed and objective measures of financial literacy newly added to the American Life Panel (ALP), and it links these performance measures to efforts consumers make to plan for retirement.We evaluate the causal relationship between financial literacy and retirement planning by exploiting information about respondents' financial knowledge acquired in school -before entering the labor market and certainly before starting to plan for retirement.Results show that those with more advanced financial knowledge are those more likely to be retirement-ready.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w15350

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a gender gap in financial literacy across many countries, with men usually scoring higher than women.

    “Another robust finding across many countries is a gender gap with respect to financial literacy (Lusardi and Mitchell 2009;Lusardi andTufano 2009, 2015;Lusardi et al. 2010;Hung et al. 2009;Mottola 2013;Bucher-Koenen et al. 2016;Agnew andHarrison 2015, Klapper et al. 2015): men usually score higher on measured financial literacy than women.”

    From Financial literacy, financial advice, and financial behavior (2017) · cites this paper as Lusardi and Mitchell 2009

  • Lusardi and Mitchell (2009) show that the Big Three are sensitive to framing, implying that some answers judged to be correct are likely attributable to guessing rather than skill.

    “Lusardi and Mitchell (2009), for instance, show that the Big Three are sensitive to framing, i.e. implying that some answers judged to be ''correct'' are likely attributable to guessing rather than skill.”

    From Financial literacy, financial advice, and financial behavior (2017) · cites this paper as Lusardi and Mitchell (2009)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O.
Affiliations
Dartmouth College (US)
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
2009-09
OpenAlex
W2098605947
Cited by
587
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 29
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Labor
  • FINRA Investor Education Foundation
  • U.S. Social Security Administration
  • Australian Government
  • Università Bocconi
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy and Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
financial literacy, retirement planning, retirement preparedness, consumer financial decision-making, school-based financial education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review