CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 170Global trade and economicsGlobal trade, sustainability, and social impactGlobal Trade and Competitiveness

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On the Measurement of Upstreamness and Downstreamness in Global Value Chains

Open access
Antràs, Pol, Chor, Davin·2018·National Bureau of Economic Research
DOI 10.3386/w24185
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper offers four contributions to the empirical literature on global value chains (GVCs).First, we provide a succinct overview of several measures developed to capture the upstreamness or downstreamness of industries and countries in GVCs.Second, we employ data from the World Input-Output Database (WIOD) to document the empirical evolution of these measures over the period 1995-2011; in doing so, we highlight salient patterns related to countries' GVC positioning -as well as some puzzling correlations -that emerge from the data.Third, we develop a theoretical framework -which builds on Caliendo and Parro's (2015) variant of the Eaton and Kortum (2002) model -that provides a structural interpretation of all the entries of the WIOD in a given year.Fourth, we resort to a calibrated version of the model to perform counterfactual exercises that: (i) sharpen our understanding of the independent effect of several factors in explaining the observed empirical patterns in the period 1995-2011; and (ii) provide guidance for how future changes in the world economy are likely to shape the positioning of countries in GVCs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w24185

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Mas-Colell, Andreu, Michael Whinston, and Jerry Green, (1995), Microeconomic Theory, Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 170

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Antràs, P., & Chor, D.
Affiliations
National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
ORCID
Chor, Davin
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Publisher
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
2018-01
DOI
10.3386/w24185
OpenAlex
W2784225229
Cited by
167
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1628852)
  • National University of Singapore
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global Trade and Competitiveness
Keywords
global value chains, upstreamness, World Input-Output Database, Eaton-Kortum model, counterfactual analysis, international trade

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review