Cited by 349Innovation Policy and R&DFiscal Policy and Economic GrowthCorporate Taxation and Avoidance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Taxation and Innovation in the 20th Century

Open access

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w24982

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Over the twentieth century, the elasticity of the number of inventors residing in a state equals 0.11 for inventors from that state and 1.23 for inventors not from that state.

    “They estimate that, over the twentieth century, the elasticity of the number of inventors residing in a state equals 0.11 for inventors from that state and 1.23 for inventors not from that state.”

    From Taxation and Migration: Evidence and Policy Implications (2020) · cites this paper as Akcigit et al. (2018)

    Table 5 (p. 45) reports a home-state personal-tax elasticity of 0.111, which rounds to 0.11, but the corresponding non-home-state estimate is 1.151, not 1.23. Section 5.4 (p. 31) likewise reports 0.10 and 1.05 for a different specification. The paper supports the distinction between the two groups, but not the claimed 1.23 estimate. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Akcigit et al. (2018) show significant effects of taxes on mobility across US states over the twentieth century.

    “New historical evidence from Akcigit et al. (2018) shows significant effects of taxes on mobility across US states.”

    From Taxation and Migration: Evidence and Policy Implications (2020) · cites this paper as Akcigit et al. (2018)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Akcigit, U., Grigsby, J., Nicholas, T., & Stantcheva, S.
Affiliations
  • Center for Economic and Policy Research (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Akcigit, Ufuk
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Published
2018-09
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2891141919
Cited by
133
References
38
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Innovation Policy and R&D
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
Keywords
taxation, innovation, corporate income tax, personal income tax, patents, inventors, R&D firms, business stealing, agglomeration economies, innovation clusters, tax brackets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review