New Technologies, Global Value Chains, and Developing Economies
Abstract
Many of the exports of developing countries are channeled through global value chains (GVCs), which also act as conduits for new technologies.However, new capabilities and productive employment remain limited so far to a tiny sliver of globally integrated firms.GVCs and new technologies exhibit features that limit the upside and may even undermine developing countries' economic performance.In particular, new technologies present a double whammy to low-income countries.First, they are generally biased towards skills and other capabilities.This bias reduces the comparative advantage of developing countries in traditionally labor-intensive manufacturing (and other) activities, and decreases their gains from trade.Second, GVCs make it harder for low-income countries to use their labor cost advantage to offset their technological disadvantage, by reducing their ability to substitute unskilled labor for other production inputs.These are two independent shocks that compound each other.The evidence to date, on the employment and trade fronts, is that the disadvantages may have more than offset the advantages.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Large multinational companies typically design production processes with domestic market factor prices in mind, so even when offshoring they might set up manufacturing processes involving large amounts of automation in host countries.
“large multinational companies typically design their production processes with their domestic market factor prices in mind, so even when they engage in offshoring, they might set up manufacturing processes involving large amounts of automation in their host countries (see Rodrik, 2018).”
From De-Globalisation? Global Value Chains in the Post-COVID-19 Age (2020) · cites this paper as Rodrik, 2018
Cites
Rodrik, D. (2008) · doi:10.1596/28009 · Cited by 471 · see citing works
Self-citationIndustrial Policy in the 21st Century
Chang, H., & Andreoni, A. (2020) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/dech.12570 · Cited by 455 · see citing works
Recent Declines in Labor's Share in US Income: A Preliminary Neoclassical Account
Lawrence, R. Z. (2015) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2622613 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
De-Globalisation? Global Value Chains in the Post-COVID-19 Age
Antràs, P. (2020) · doi:10.3386/w28115 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rodrik, D.
- Affiliations
- Ifo Institute for Economic Research (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Rodrik, Dani
- ORCID
- Rodrik, Dani
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 2018-10
- OpenAlex
- W2897933091
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 59 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 17
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Technological Innovation
- Keywords
- global value chains, new technologies, developing countries, low-income countries, skill-biased technological change, comparative advantage, labor-intensive manufacturing, gains from trade, labor cost advantage, employment effects, technology diffusion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review