Cited by 51Air Quality and Health ImpactsEnvironmental and Air Quality ManagementAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols

Recent Increases in Air Pollution: Evidence and Implications for Mortality

Open access
Clay, Karen, Muller, Nicholas·2019·National Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract

After declining by 24.2% from 2009 to 2016, annual average fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in the United States in counties with monitors increased by 5.5% between 2016 and 2018. Increases occurred in multiple census regions and in counties that were in and out of attainment with National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). We explore channels through which the increase may have occurred including increases in economic activity, increases in wildfires, and decreases in Clean Air Act enforcement actions. The health implications of this increase in PM2.5 between 2016 and 2018 are significant. The increase was associated with 9, 700 additional premature deaths in 2018. At conventional valuations, these deaths represent damages of $89 billion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w26381

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An increase in the frequency and severity of wildfires is contributing to a recent increase in PM2.5 concentrations in the western US after a decades-long reduction in air pollution.

    “An increase in the frequency and severity of wildfires is contributing to a recent increase in PM 2.5 concentrations in the western US after a decades-long reduction in air pollution.4,[31][32][33][34]”

    From Association of Wildfire Air Pollution and Health Care Use for Atopic Dermatitis and Itch (2021) · cites this paper as [4]

    Section 4.2 (Wildfires; page unavailable) says wildfires may account for some of the 2016–2018 PM2.5 increase in the West, but not the overall decline-and-reversal pattern. The Introduction describes the preceding decline as roughly a decade, not decades, and the paper does not establish that wildfires increased in both frequency and severity. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clay, K., & Muller, N.
Affiliations
National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
2019-10
OpenAlex
W2980776304
Cited by
51
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental and Air Quality Management
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Keywords
air pollution, PM2.5, particulate matter, air quality trends, premature mortality, health damage, forest fires, National Ambient Air Quality Standards, economic activity, air quality monitoring, United States counties

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review