Social Media and Xenophobia: Evidence from Russia
Abstract
We study the causal effect of social media on ethnic hate crimes and xenophobic attitudes in Russia using quasi-exogenous variation in social media penetration across cities. Higher penetration of social media led to more ethnic hate crimes, but only in cities with a high pre-existing level of nationalist sentiment. Consistent with a mechanism of coordination of crimes, the effects are stronger for crimes with multiple perpetrators. We implement a national survey experiment and show that social media persuaded young and low-educated individuals to hold more xenophobic attitudes, but did not increase respondents' openness to expressing these views. Our results are consistent with a simple model of social learning where penetration of social networks increases individuals' propensity to meet like-minded people. Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Common causal inference techniques used in the sample include instrumental variable designs, matching approaches, and panel designs.
“Common causal inference techniques that were used in our sample include instrumental variable designs that introduce exogenous variation in the treatment variable59–63, matching approaches to explicitly balance treatment and control groups64–66, and panel designs that account for unobserved confounders with unit and/or time-fixed effects67,68.”
From A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy (2022) · cites this paper as [62]
There was causal evidence that digital media can propagate ethnic hate crimes in both democratic and authoritarian countries.
“and there was causal evidence that digital media can propagate ethnic hate crimes in both democratic and authoritarian countries62,68.”
From A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy (2022) · cites this paper as [62]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social Media, News Consumption, and Polarization: Evidence from a Field Experiment
Levy, R. (2021) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20191777 · Cited by 624 · see citing works
Social Media and Protest Participation: Evidence From Russia
Enikolopov, R., Makarin, A., & Petrova, M. (2020) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta14281 · Cited by 489 · see citing works
Self-citationA systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy
Lorenz-Spreen, P., Oswald, L., Lewandowsky, S., & Hertwig, R. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01460-1 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Misunderstanding the harms of online misinformation
Budak, C., Nyhan, B., Rothschild, D. M., Thorson, E., & Watts, D. J. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07417-w · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Broadband Internet and social capital
Geraci, A., Nardotto, M., Reggiani, T., & Sabatini, F. (2022) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2021.104578 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Local Journalism under Private Equity Ownership
Ewens, M., Gupta, A., & Howell, S. T. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3939405 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bursztyn, L., Egorov, G., Enikolopov, R., & Petrova, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Barcelona School of Economics (ES)
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 2019-12
- OpenAlex
- W2995882014
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 9 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Keywords
- social media, xenophobia, nationalist sentiment, social learning, survey experiment, social networks, Russia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review