Portfolio Delegation and 401(k) Plan Participant Responses to COVID-19
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Institutional investors are less likely to turn away from sustainable investments during market turbulence and economic downturns.
“As such, institutional investors are less likely to turn away from sustainable investments during market turbulence and economic downturns (see, e.g., Blanchett, Finke, and Reuter (2020), Cao, Titman, Zhan, and Zhang (2023)).”
From Sustainability Preferences Under Stress: Evidence from COVID-19 (2020) · cites this paper as Blanchett, Finke, and Reuter (2020)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 13 · Cited by 10
- Authors
- Blanchett, D., Finke, M., & Reuter, J.
- Affiliations
- Boston College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Reuter, Jonathan
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 2020-06
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3037963291
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
- National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- 401(k) plans, COVID-19 pandemic, target date funds, robo-advisors, investor sophistication, liquidity constraints, job loss
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
