The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Climate Regulatory Risk and Corporate Bonds
Open accessAbstract
Concerns about climate risk suggest it should affect risk assessment and pricing of corporate securities, particularly for firms facing potential regulatory restrictions. Employing a shock to expected climate regulations, we find support for this hypothesis given our evidence that climate regulatory risks causally affect bond credit ratings and yield spreads. Moreover, a structural credit model indicates the increased spreads for high carbon issuers, especially those located in stricter regulatory environments, derive from changes in firms' asset volatilities rather than asset values, highlighting that regulatory uncertainty affects security pricing. The results have important implications for corporate decisions, portfolio management, and policymaking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
RETRACTED: Common risk factors in the cross-section of corporate bond returns
Bai, J., Bali, T. G., & Wen, Q. (2019) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.08.002 · Cited by 296
RetractedThe Importance of Climate Risks for Institutional Investors
Krueger, P., Sautner, Z., & Starks, L. T. (2020) · The Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhz137 · Cited by 3,034
Self-citationLarge sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects
Abadie, A., & Imbens, G. W. (2006) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00655.x · Cited by 2,908
Flammer, C. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3125518 · Cited by 2,901
Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence
Dyck, A., Lins, K. V., Roth, L., & Wagner, H. F. (2019) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.08.013 · Cited by 2,547
Flammer, C. (2021) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.01.010 · Cited by 2,504
Political uncertainty and risk premia
Pástor, Ľ., & Veronesi, P. (2013) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.08.007 · Cited by 2,331
Sustainable investing in equilibrium
Pástor, Ľ., Stambaugh, R. F., & Taylor, L. A. (2021) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.12.011 · Cited by 2,226
Responsible investing: The ESG-efficient frontier
Pedersen, L. H., Fitzgibbons, S., & Pomorski, L. (2021) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.11.001 · Cited by 2,103
Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth
Krüger, P. (2015) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.09.008 · Cited by 1,901
Cited by
The Importance of Climate Risks for Institutional Investors
Krueger, P., Sautner, Z., & Starks, L. T. (2020) · The Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhz137 · Cited by 3,034
Self-citationPresidential Address: Sustainable Finance and ESG Issues— Value versus Values
STARKS, L. T. (2023) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.13255 · Cited by 474
Self-citationA review on ESG investing: Investors' expectations, beliefs and perceptions
Kräussl, R., Oladiran, T., & Stefanova, D. (2024) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/joes.12599 · Cited by 175
Metadata
- Authors
- Seltzer, L., Starks, L., & Zhu, Q.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 2022-04
- OpenAlex
- W4225311158
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 49
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Climate Regulatory Risk and Corporate Bonds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w29994
- The paper
- Seltzer, L., Starks, L., & Zhu, Q. (2022). Climate Regulatory Risk and Corporate Bonds. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w29994
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.