Cited by 56Corporate Social Responsibility ReportingSustainable Finance and Green BondsEnvironmental Sustainability in Business

Demand for ESG

Baker, Malcolm, Egan, Mark, Sarkar, Suproteem·2022·National Bureau of Economic Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w30708

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Baker, Egan, and Sarkar (2022) and Barber, Morse, and Yasuda (2021) provide evidence that some people are willing to give up returns to invest according to their preferences.

    “As discussed earlier, Baker, Egan, and Sarkar (2022) and Barber, Morse, and Yasuda (2021) provide evidence that some people are willing to give up returns to invest according to their preferences.”

    From Presidential Address: Sustainable Finance and ESG Issues— <i>Value</i> versus <i>Values</i> (2023) · cites this paper as Baker, Egan, and Sarkar (2022)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baker, M., Egan, M., & Sarkar, S.
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
2022-12
OpenAlex
W4310713231
Cited by
55
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
Keywords
ESG, environmental, social and governance criteria, corporate sustainability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review