The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Marriage, Motherhood, and Wages
Open accessAbstract
We explore several problems in drawing causal inferences from cross-sectional relationships between marriage, motherhood, and wages. We find that heterogeneity leads to biased estimates of the effects of marriage and motherhood on wages (i.e., effects net of experience and tenure); first-difference estimates reveal no direct effect of marriage or motherhood on women's wages. We also find statistical evidence that experience and tenure may be endogenous variables in wage equations; instrumental variables estimates suggest that both ordinary least squares cross-sectional and first-difference estimates understate the direct (negative) effect of children on wages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
Heckman, J. J. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912352 · Cited by 28,779
Specification Tests in Econometrics
Hausman, J. A. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913827 · Cited by 18,820
Becker, G. S. (1991) · doi:10.4159/9780674020665 · Cited by 10,565
Economics of the Family: Marriage, Children, and Human Capital
Mincer, J., & Polacheck, S. (n.d.) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 2,070
Heckman, J. (1989) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w2861 · Cited by 882
Does Marriage Really Make Men More Productive?
Korenman, S., & Neumark, D. (1991) · The Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.2307/145924 · Cited by 692
Self-citationSibling Models and Data in Economics: Beginnings of a Survey
Griliches, Z. (1979) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260822 · Cited by 647
Birth and Fortune. The Impact of Numbers on Personal Welfare
L., H., & Easterlin, R. A. (1981) · Population (French Edition) · doi:10.2307/1532629 · Cited by 622
The Emergence of Countercyclical U.S. Fertility
Butz, W., & Ward, M. P. (1977) · American Economic Review · Cited by 479
A Least Squares Correction for Selectivity Bias
Olsen, R. J. (1980) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1911938 · Cited by 363
Cited by
Chapter 48 Race and gender in the labor market
Altonji, J. G., & Blank, R. M. (1999) · Handbook of Labor Economics · doi:10.1016/s1573-4463(99)30039-0 · Cited by 981
The effects of motherhood timing on career path
Miller, A. R. (2011) · Journal of Population Economics · doi:10.1007/s00148-009-0296-x · Cited by 573
Do Highly Paid, Highly Skilled Women Experience the Largest Motherhood Penalty?
England, P., Bearak, J., Budig, M. J., & Hodges, M. J. (2016) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122416673598 · Cited by 365
THE FAMILY GAP IN PAY: EVIDENCE FROM SEVEN INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRIES
Harkness, S., & Waldfogel, J. (2004) · Research in Labor Economics · doi:10.1016/s0147-9121(03)22012-4 · Cited by 277
The motherhood wage penalty: A meta-analysis
Cukrowska-Torzewska, E., & Matysiak, A. (2020) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2020.102416 · Cited by 198
Metadata
- Authors
- Korenman, S., & Neumark, D.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 1990-10
- OpenAlex
- W3124868588
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 19
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Marriage, Motherhood, and Wages. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w3473
- The paper
- Korenman, S., & Neumark, D. (1990). Marriage, Motherhood, and Wages. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3473
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.