The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Valuation of New Goods under Perfect and Imperfect Competition
Open accessAbstract
urmupr.o cr.66r.CGr.6T cb o oq cs CLGW iiq ?topnr pscows C6 pUr.c o wrrcp o WGETCIJ (ziq bU626) pf12tU622 bLCCC62 JJ6 or.qr;Gr.6ure)orn br.oqncc r.oIu TC cowb6CrCor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Deposit Competition and Financial Fragility: Evidence from the US Banking Sector
Egan, M., Hortaçsu, A., & Matvos, G. (2017) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20150342 · Cited by 435
Uniform Pricing in U.S. Retail Chains*
DellaVigna, S., & Gentzkow, M. (2019) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjz019 · Cited by 409
Brand and Quantity Choice Dynamics Under Price Uncertainty
Erdem, T., Imai, S., & Keane, M. P. (2003) · Quantitative Marketing and Economics · doi:10.1023/a:1023536326497 · Cited by 331
Retail Globalization and Household Welfare: Evidence from Mexico
Atkin, D., Faber, B., & Gonzalez-Navarro, M. (2018) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/695476 · Cited by 263
Index providers: Whales behind the scenes of ETFs
An, Y., Benetton, M., & Song, Y. (2023) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2023.06.003 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Hausman, J.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 1994-12
- Pages
- 207-248
- OpenAlex
- W1592051488
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 0
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Valuation of New Goods under Perfect and Imperfect Competition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w4970
- The paper
- Hausman, J. (1994). Valuation of New Goods under Perfect and Imperfect Competition. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w4970
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
