The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Welfare, the Earned Income Tax Credit, and the Labor Supply of Single Mothers
Open accessAbstract
During 1984-96, welfare and tax policy changed dramatically.The Earned Income Tax Credit was expanded, welfare benefits were cut, welfare time limits were added and cases were terminated, Medicaid for the working poor was expanded, training programs were redirected, and subsidized or free child care was expanded.Many of the program changes were intended to encourage low income women to work.During this same time period there were unprecedented increases in the employment and hours of single mothers, particularly those with young children.In this paper, we first document these large changes in policies and employment.We then examine if the policy changes are the reason for the large increases in single mothers' labor supply.We find evidence that a large share of the increase in work by single mothers can be attributed to the EITC, with smaller shares for welfare benefit reductions, welfare waivers, changes in training programs, and child care expansions.We also find that most of these policies increased hours worked.Our results indicate that financial incentives through the tax and welfare systems have substantial effects on single mothers' labor supply decisions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion
Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009) · doi:10.1515/9781400829828 · Cited by 9,467
The elasticity of taxable income: evidence and implications
Gruber, J., & Saez, E. (2002) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/s0047-2727(01)00085-8 · Cited by 990
Do Taxpayers Bunch at Kink Points?
Saez, E. (2010) · American Economic Journal: Economic Policy · doi:10.1257/pol.2.3.180 · Cited by 950
Income, the Earned Income Tax Credit, and Infant Health
Hoynes, H., Miller, D., & Simon, D. (2015) · American Economic Journal: Economic Policy · doi:10.1257/pol.20120179 · Cited by 551
The Gender Pay Gap: Have Women Gone as Far as They Can?
Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2007) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2007.24286161 · Cited by 554
Universal Basic Incomes versus Targeted Transfers: Anti-Poverty Programs in Developing Countries
Hanna, R., & Olken, B. A. (2018) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.32.4.201 · Cited by 299
Effects of Prenatal Poverty on Infant Health: State Earned Income Tax Credits and Birth Weight
Strully, K. W., Rehkopf, D. H., & Xuan, Z. (2010) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122410374086 · Cited by 255
Holzer, H. J., Offner, P., & Sorensen, E. (2005) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.1002/pam.20092 · Cited by 190
Welfare Reform, Saving, and Vehicle Ownership: Do Asset Limits and Vehicle Exemptions Matter?
Sullivan, J. X. (2006) · Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.3368/jhr.xli.1.72 · Cited by 71
(2002) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 36
Koebel, K., & Schirle, T. (2016) · Canadian Public Policy · doi:10.3138/cpp.2015-049 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Meyer, B., & Rosenbaum, D.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 1999-09
- OpenAlex
- W2891375463
- Cited by
- 699
- References
- 0
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.