Cited by 190Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisLabor market dynamics and wage inequalityGender, Labor, and Family Dynamics

Declining employment among young black less-educated men: The role of incarceration and child support

Holzer, Harry J., Offner, Paul, Sorensen, Elaine·2005·Journal of Policy Analysis and Management

Abstract

In this paper, we explore the continuing decline in employment and labor force participation of nonenrolled Black men between the ages of 16 and 34 who have a high school education or less in the 1980s and 1990s. We focus on two fairly new developments: (1) the dramatic growth in the number of young Black men who have been incarcerated and (2) strengthened enforcement of child support policies. We analyze micro-level data from the Current Population Survey Outgoing Rotation Groups (CPS-ORG), into which state-level data over time on incarceration rates and child support enforcement have been merged. Our results indicate that previous incarceration and child support enforcement can account for half or more of the decline in employment activity among Black men aged 25–34. Previous incarceration also contributes to the decline among those aged 16–24. © 2005 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pam.20092

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increasingly sophisticated demographic estimates documented disparities in crime and incarceration and their consequences for economic activity and labor markets.

    “Early works called attention to the staggeringly disparate rates of crime and incarceration (Hagan and Peterson 1995;Tonry 2022), and increasingly sophisticated demographic estimates documented these disparities and their consequences for economic activity and labor markets (Apel and Sweeten 2010;Holzer et al. 2005;Pager 2003;Pettit 2012;Pettit and Western 2004;Western 2006;Western and Beckett 199”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holzer, H. J., Offner, P., & Sorensen, E.
Affiliations
  • Georgetown University (US)
  • Urban Institute (US)
Venue
Journal of Policy Analysis and Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
329-350
ISSN
  • 0276-8739 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6688
OpenAlex
W2026893866
Cited by
190
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
36.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Policy Analysis and Management (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Issue Lab (Candid) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Keywords
incarceration, child support enforcement, employment decline, labor force participation, Black men, young men, low educational attainment, criminal records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review