The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Education for Growth: Why and For Whom?
Open accessAbstract
This paper tries to reconcile evidence from the mi.croeconometric and empirical macro growth literatures on the effect of schooling on income and GDP growth.Much microeconometric evidence suggest that education is an important causal determinant of income for individuals within countries.At a national level., however, recent studies have found that increases in educational attainment are unrelated to economic growth.This finding appears to be a spurious result of the extremely high rate of measurement error in firstdifferenced cross-country education data.After accounting for measurement error, the effect of changes in educational attainment on income growth in cross-country data is at least as great as microeconometric estimates of the rate of return to years of schooling.Another finding of the macro growth literaturethat economic growth depends positively on the initial stock of human capital -is shown to result from imposing linearity and constant-coefficient assumptions on the estimates.These restrictions are often rejected by the data, and once either assumption is relaxed the initial level of education has little effect on economic growth for the average country.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the mechanics of economic development
Lucas, R. E. (1988) · Journal of Monetary Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7 · Cited by 24,085
Endogenous Technological Change
Romer, P. M. (1990) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261725 · Cited by 17,711
Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement
Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00584.x · Cited by 4,501
The Penn World Table (Mark 5): An Expanded Set of International Comparisons, 1950-1988
Summers, R., & Heston, A. (1991) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2937941 · Cited by 3,429
Empirical Strategies in Labor Economics
Angrist, J. D., & Krueger, A. B. (1999) · Handbook of Labor Economics · doi:10.1016/s1573-4463(99)03004-7 · Cited by 1,628
Self-citation
Cited by
Economic Shocks and Civil Conflict: An Instrumental Variables Approach
Miguel, E., Satyanath, S., & Sergenti, E. (2004) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/421174 · Cited by 2,460
The Role of Financial Development in Growth and Investment
Benhabib, J., & Spiegel, M. M. (2000) · Journal of Economic Growth · doi:10.1023/a:1026599402490 · Cited by 489
Capital account liberalization and growth: was Mr. Mahathir right?
Eichengreen, B., & Leblang, D. (2003) · International Journal of Finance & Economics · doi:10.1002/ijfe.208 · Cited by 261
Mlachila, M., & Moeletsi, T. (2019) · IMF Working Papers · doi:10.5089/9781498301374.001 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Krueger, A., & Lindahl, M.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 2000-03
- OpenAlex
- W3144287231
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 5
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Education for Growth: Why and For Whom? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w7591
- The paper
- Krueger, A., & Lindahl, M. (2000). Education for Growth: Why and For Whom? National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w7591
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.