Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,442

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation

Open access
Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon, Robinson, James·2000·National Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract

7KH &RORQLDO 2ULJLQV RI &RPSDUDWLYH 'HYHORSPHQW $Q (PSLUL.DO ,QYHVWLJDWLRQ 'DURQ $.HPRJOX 6LPRQ -RKQVRQ DQG -DPHV $ 5RELQVRQ 1%(5 :RUNLQJ 3DSHU 1R -XQH -(/ 1R 2 3 3 $%#% :H H[SORLW GLIIHUHQ.HV LQ WKH PRUWDOLW\ UDWHV ID.HG E\ (XURSHDQ .RORQLDOLVWV WR HVWLPDWH WKH HIIH.W RI LQVWLWXWLRQV RQ H.RQRPL. SHUIRUPDQ.H 2XU DUJXPHQW LV WKDW (XURSHDQV DGRSWHG YHU\ GLIIHUHQW .RORQL]DWLRQ SROL.LHV LQ GLIIHUHQW .RORQLHV ZLWK GLIIHUHQW DVVR.LDWHG LQVWLWXWLRQV 7KH

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w7771

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,442

Metadata

Authors
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J.
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
2000-06
OpenAlex
W4300848461
Cited by
1,442
References
1
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w7771
The paper
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. (2000). The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w7771

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.