Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,072

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables

Open access
Levinsohn, James, Petrin, Amil·2000·National Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract

We introduce a new method for conditioning out serially correlated unobserved shocks to the production technology by building ideas first developed in Olley and Pakes (1996).Olley and Pakes show how to use investment to control for correlation between input levels and the unobserved firmspecific productivity process.We prove that like investment, intermediate inputs (those inputs which are typically subtracted out in a value-added production function) can also solve this simultaneity problem.We highlight three potential advantages to using an intermediate inputs approach relative to investment.Our results indicate that these advantages are empirically important.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w7819

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,072

Metadata

Authors
Levinsohn, J., & Petrin, A.
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
2000-08
OpenAlex
W2061821648
Cited by
1,072
References
0
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w7819
The paper
Levinsohn, J., & Petrin, A. (2000). Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w7819

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.