Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 431

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Why Doesn't the US Have a European-Style Welfare System?

Open access
Alesina, Alberto, Glaeser, Edward, Sacerdote, Bruce·2001·National Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract

European countries are much more generous to the poor relative to the US level of generosity.Economic models suggest that redistribution is a function of the variance and skewness of the pre-tax income distribution, the volatility of income (perhaps because of trade shocks), the social costs of taxation and the expected income mobility of the median voter.None of these factors appear to explain the differences between the US and Europe.Instead, the differences appear to be the result of racial heterogeneity in the US and American political institutions.Racial animosity in the US makes redistribution to the poor, who are disproportionately black, unappealing to many voters.American political institutions limited the growth of a socialist party, and more generally limited the political power of the poor.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w8524

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 55 references

Cited by

See all 431

Metadata

Authors
Alesina, A., Glaeser, E., & Sacerdote, B.
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
2001-10
OpenAlex
W2106676663
Cited by
431
References
55
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why Doesn't the US Have a European-Style Welfare System? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w8524
The paper
Alesina, A., Glaeser, E., & Sacerdote, B. (2001). Why Doesn't the US Have a European-Style Welfare System? National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w8524

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.