The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why Doesn't the US Have a European-Style Welfare System?
Open accessAbstract
European countries are much more generous to the poor relative to the US level of generosity.Economic models suggest that redistribution is a function of the variance and skewness of the pre-tax income distribution, the volatility of income (perhaps because of trade shocks), the social costs of taxation and the expected income mobility of the median voter.None of these factors appear to explain the differences between the US and Europe.Instead, the differences appear to be the result of racial heterogeneity in the US and American political institutions.Racial animosity in the US makes redistribution to the poor, who are disproportionately black, unappealing to many voters.American political institutions limited the growth of a socialist party, and more generally limited the political power of the poor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-2454 · Cited by 28,789
Africa's Growth Tragedy: Policies and Ethnic Divisions
Easterly, W., & Levine, R. (1997) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355300555466 · Cited by 5,649
A Rational Theory of the Size of Government
Meltzer, A. H., & Richard, S. F. (1981) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261013 · Cited by 5,485
Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics
RABIN, M. (2011) · Advances in Behavioral Economics · doi:10.2307/j.ctvcm4j8j.15 · Cited by 4,705
Distributive Politics and Economic Growth
Alesina, A., & Rodrik, D. (1994) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118470 · Cited by 4,406
Self-citationWhy do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments?
Rodrik, D. (1998) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/250038 · Cited by 3,152
The Economics of Discrimination
Leonard, R. C., & Becker, G. S. (1957) · The American Catholic Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3708738 · Cited by 2,818
Is Inequality Harmful for GrowthPreprint
Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (1993) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 2,648
Public Goods and Ethnic Divisions
Alesina, A., Baqir, R., & Easterly, W. (1999) · Policy Research Working Papers · doi:10.1596/1813-9450-2108 · Cited by 2,179
Self-citationThe Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis
Cameron, D. R. (1978) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1954537 · Cited by 2,078
Cited by
Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Easterly, W., Kurlat, S., & Wacziarg, R. (2003) · Journal of Economic Growth · doi:10.1023/a:1024471506938 · Cited by 3,432
Self-citationBaland, J.-M., Moene, K. O., & Robinson, J. A. (2010) · Handbook of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-52944-2.00007-0 · Cited by 593
Immigration and Ethnic Change in Low‐Fertility Countries: A Third Demographic Transition
Coleman, D. (2006) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2006.00131.x · Cited by 462
Hoi, C. K., Wu, Q., & Zhang, H. (2019) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.02.009 · Cited by 322
Linguistic Diversity and Redistribution
Desmet, K., Ortuño-Ortín, I., & Weber, S. (2009) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1162/jeea.2009.7.6.1291 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Alesina, A., Glaeser, E., & Sacerdote, B.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 2001-10
- OpenAlex
- W2106676663
- Cited by
- 431
- References
- 55
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why Doesn't the US Have a European-Style Welfare System? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w8524
- The paper
- Alesina, A., Glaeser, E., & Sacerdote, B. (2001). Why Doesn't the US Have a European-Style Welfare System? National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w8524
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.