The DOI matches its Crossref record.
For Better or For Worse: Default Effects and 401(k) Savings Behavior
Open accessAbstract
In the last several years, many employers have decided to automatically enroll their new employees in the company 401(k) plan.Using several years of administrative data from three large firms, we analyze the impact of automatic enrollment on 401(k) participation rates, savings behavior, and asset accumulation.We find that although employees can opt out of the 401(k) plan, few choose to do so.As a result, automatic enrollment has a dramatic impact on retirement savings behavior: 401(k) participation rates at all three firms exceed 85%, but participants tend to anchor at a low default savings rate and in a conservative default investment vehicle.We find that initially, about 80% of participants accept both the default savings rate (2% or 3% for our three companies) and the default investment fund (a stable value or money market fund).Even after three years, half of the plan participants subject to automatic enrollment continue to contribute at the default rate and invest their contributions exclusively in the default fund.The effects of automatic enrollment on asset accumulation are not straightforward.While higher participation rates promote wealth accumulation, the low default savings rate and the conservative default investment fund undercut accumulation.In our sample, these two effects are roughly offsetting on average.However, automatic enrollment does increase saving in the lower tail of the savings distribution by dramatically reducing the fraction of employees who do not participate in the 401(k) plan.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Debt Literacy, Financial Experiences, and Overindebtedness
Lusardi, A., & Tufano, P. (2009) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w14808 · Cited by 834
Chater, N., & Loewenstein, G. (2023) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x22002023 · Cited by 710
Down or Out: Assessing the Welfare Costs of Household Investment Mistakes
Calvet, L. E., Campbell, J. Y., & Sodini, P. (2006) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.881768 · Cited by 355
Minimum Payments and Debt Paydown in Consumer Credit Cards
Keys, B., & Wang, J. (2016) · doi:10.3386/w22742 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Choi, J., Laibson, D., Madrian, B., & Metrick, A.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 2001-12
- OpenAlex
- W2110070697
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 0
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: For Better or For Worse: Default Effects and 401(k) Savings Behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w8651
- The paper
- Choi, J., Laibson, D., Madrian, B., & Metrick, A. (2001). For Better or For Worse: Default Effects and 401(k) Savings Behavior. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w8651
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.