The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does Income Inequality Lead to Consumption Inequality? Evidence and Theory
Open accessAbstract
This paper first documents the evolution of the cross-sectional income and consumption distribution in the US in the past 25 years.Using data from the Consumer Expenditure Survey we find that a rising income inequality has not been accompanied by a corresponding rise in consumption inequality.Over the period from 1972 to 1998 the standard deviation of the log of after-tax labor income has increased by 20% while the standard deviation of log consumption has increased less than 2%.Furthermore income inequality has increased both between and within education groups while consumption inequality has increased between education groups but mildly declined within groups.We then argue that these empirical findings are consistent with the hypothesis that an increase in income volatility has been an important cause of the increase in income inequality, but at the same time has lead to an endogenous development of credit markets, allowing households to better smooth their consumption against idiosyncratic income fluctuations.We develop a consumption model in which the sharing of income risk is limited by imperfect enforcement of credit contracts and in which the development of financial markets depends on the volatility of the individual income process.This model is shown to be quantitatively consistent with the joint evolution of income and consumption inequality in US, while other commonly used consumption models are not.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Theory of the Consumption Function
Friedman, M. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9780691188485 · Cited by 3,335
Cited by
Consumption Inequality and Family Labor Supply
Blundell, R., Pistaferri, L., & Saporta-Eksten, I. (2016) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20121549 · Cited by 462
Has Consumption Inequality Mirrored Income Inequality?
Aguiar, M., & Bils, M. (2015) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20120599 · Cited by 444
Limited asset markets participation, monetary policy and (inverted) aggregate demand logic
Bilbiie, F. O. (2008) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2007.07.008 · Cited by 431
Asset pricing with idiosyncratic risk and overlapping generations
Storesletten, K., Telmer, C. I., & Yaron, A. (2007) · Review of Economic Dynamics · doi:10.1016/j.red.2007.02.004 · Cited by 348
The nature of credit constraints and human capital
Lochner, L. J., & Monge-Naranjo, A. (2011) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.101.6.2487 · Cited by 347
Metadata
- Authors
- Krueger, D., & Perri, F.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 2002-09
- OpenAlex
- W2792065086
- Cited by
- 595
- References
- 1
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does Income Inequality Lead to Consumption Inequality? Evidence and Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w9202
- The paper
- Krueger, D., & Perri, F. (2002). Does Income Inequality Lead to Consumption Inequality? Evidence and Theory. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w9202
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.