Cited by 3,335Economic Theory and PolicyEconomic theories and modelsEconomic Theory and Institutions

Theory of the Consumption Function

Open access
Friedman, Milton·1957·Princeton University Press eBooks

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9780691188485

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Annual income is a poor proxy for a family's consumption and investment possibilities and may be measured with substantial error in population surveys.

    “As has long been recognized (Modigliani and Brumberg 1954; Friedman 1957), annual income is a poor proxy for a family's consumption and investment possibilities, and in any case it may be measured with substantial error in population surveys.”

    From Permanent Income and the Black-White Test Score Gap (2013) · cites this paper as Friedman 1957

    Chapter VI distinguishes measured income from permanent income and describes consumption as adjusted to permanent income, supporting the point that annual income can be a poor proxy for consumption possibilities. In “The Relative versus the Absolute Income Hypotheses” (page unavailable), Friedman questions the accuracy of income and consumption data for a sample of farm families. That passage does not establish substantial income-measurement error in population surveys generally, and the passages do not directly address investment possibilities. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Friedman, M.
Corresponding author
Friedman, Milton
Venue
Princeton University Press eBooks
Published
1957-12-31
OpenAlex
W3204170628
Cited by
3,335
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 154 · 2025: 164 · 2024: 151 · 2023: 115 · 2022: 142 · 2021: 164 · 2020: 117 · 2019: 141 · 2018: 140 · 2017: 107 · 2016: 117 · 2015: 102 · 2014: 103 · 2013: 94 · 2012: 99
FWCI
49.50
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economic Theory and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic theories and models
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
Keywords
consumption function, consumer behavior, household consumption, income and consumption, Keynesian consumption theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review