Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 345

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fifty Years of Mincer Earnings Regressions

Open access
Heckman, James, Lochner, Lance, Todd, Petra·2003·National Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract

The Mincer earnings function is the cornerstone of a large literature in empirical economics.This paper discusses the theoretical foundations of the Mincer model and examines the empirical support for it using data from Decennial Censuses and Current Population Surveys.While data from 1940 and 1950 Censuses provide some support for Mincer's model, data from later decades are inconsistent with it.We examine the importance of relaxing functional form assumptions in estimating internal rates of return to schooling and of accounting for taxes, tuition, nonlinearity in schooling, and nonseparability between schooling and work experience.Inferences about trends in rates of return to high school and college obtained from our more general model differ substantially from inferences drawn from estimates based on a Mincer earnings regression.Important differences also arise between cohort-based and cross-sectional estimates of the rate of return to schooling.In the recent period of rapid technological progress, widely used cross-sectional applications of the Mincer model produce dramatically biased estimates of cohort returns to schooling.We also examine the implications of accounting for uncertainty and agent expectation formation.Even when the static framework of Mincer is maintained, accounting for uncertainty substantially affects the return estimates.Considering the sequential resolution of uncertainty over time in a dynamic setting gives rise to option values, which fundamentally changes the analysis of schooling decisions.In the presence of sequential resolution of uncertainty and option values, the internal rate of return -a cornerstone of classical human capital theory -is not a useful guide to policy analysis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w9732

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 345

Metadata

Authors
Heckman, J., Lochner, L., & Todd, P.
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
2003-05
OpenAlex
W1555034039
Cited by
345
References
3
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fifty Years of Mincer Earnings Regressions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w9732
The paper
Heckman, J., Lochner, L., & Todd, P. (2003). Fifty Years of Mincer Earnings Regressions. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w9732

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.