The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fifty Years of Mincer Earnings Regressions
Open accessAbstract
The Mincer earnings function is the cornerstone of a large literature in empirical economics.This paper discusses the theoretical foundations of the Mincer model and examines the empirical support for it using data from Decennial Censuses and Current Population Surveys.While data from 1940 and 1950 Censuses provide some support for Mincer's model, data from later decades are inconsistent with it.We examine the importance of relaxing functional form assumptions in estimating internal rates of return to schooling and of accounting for taxes, tuition, nonlinearity in schooling, and nonseparability between schooling and work experience.Inferences about trends in rates of return to high school and college obtained from our more general model differ substantially from inferences drawn from estimates based on a Mincer earnings regression.Important differences also arise between cohort-based and cross-sectional estimates of the rate of return to schooling.In the recent period of rapid technological progress, widely used cross-sectional applications of the Mincer model produce dramatically biased estimates of cohort returns to schooling.We also examine the implications of accounting for uncertainty and agent expectation formation.Even when the static framework of Mincer is maintained, accounting for uncertainty substantially affects the return estimates.Considering the sequential resolution of uncertainty over time in a dynamic setting gives rise to option values, which fundamentally changes the analysis of schooling decisions.In the presence of sequential resolution of uncertainty and option values, the internal rate of return -a cornerstone of classical human capital theory -is not a useful guide to policy analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Changes in Relative Wages, 1963-1987: Supply and Demand Factors
Katz, L. F., & Murphy, K. M. (1992) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118323 · Cited by 4,793
Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data
Heckman, J., Ichimura, H., Smith, J., & Todd, P. (1998) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/2999630 · Cited by 2,286
Self-citationThe Evidence on Credit Constraints in Post-Secondary Schooling
Carneiro, P., & Heckman, J. (2002) · doi:10.3386/w9055 · Cited by 276
Self-citation
Cited by
DiPrete, T. A., & Eirich, G. M. (2006) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.32.061604.123127 · Cited by 2,069
Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2003) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.422902 · Cited by 1,020
Chapter 9 Why Has Black–White Skill Convergence Stopped?
Neal, D. (2006) · Handbook of the Economics of Education · doi:10.1016/s1574-0692(06)01009-9 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Heckman, J., Lochner, L., & Todd, P.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 2003-05
- OpenAlex
- W1555034039
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 3
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fifty Years of Mincer Earnings Regressions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w9732
- The paper
- Heckman, J., Lochner, L., & Todd, P. (2003). Fifty Years of Mincer Earnings Regressions. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w9732
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.