Cited by 25vaccines and immunoinformatics approachesMachine Learning in BioinformaticsChemical Synthesis and Analysis

Improved prediction of MHC-peptide binding using protein language models

Open access
Hashemi, Nasser, Hao, Boran, Ignatov, Mikhail, Paschalidis, Ioannis Ch., Vakili, Pirooz, Vajda, Sandor, Kozakov, Dima·2023·Frontiers in Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Major histocompatibility complex Class I (MHC-I) molecules bind to peptides derived from intracellular antigens and present them on the surface of cells, allowing the immune system (T cells) to detect them. Elucidating the process of this presentation is essential for regulation and potential manipulation of the cellular immune system. Predicting whether a given peptide binds to an MHC molecule is an important step in the above process and has motivated the introduction of many computational approaches to address this problem. NetMHCPan, a pan-specific model for predicting binding of peptides to any MHC molecule, is one of the most widely used methods which focuses on solving this binary classification problem using shallow neural networks. The recent successful results of Deep Learning (DL) methods, especially Natural Language Processing (NLP-based) pretrained models in various applications, including protein structure determination, motivated us to explore their use in this problem. Specifically, we consider the application of deep learning models pretrained on large datasets of protein sequences to predict MHC Class I-peptide binding. Using the standard performance metrics in this area, and the same training and test sets, we show that our models outperform NetMHCpan4.1, currently considered as the-state-of-the-art.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fbinf.2023.1207380

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Hashemi, N., Hao, B., Ignatov, M., Paschalidis, I. C., Vakili, P., Vajda, S., & Kozakov, D.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Stony Brook University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Hashemi, Nasser
  • Kozakov, Dima
Venue
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
Published
2023-08-17
Volume
3
Pages
1207380-1207380
ISSN
2673-7647 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385982832
Cited by
25
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OpenBU (Boston University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1645681, 2054251, 1664644, RM1135136, 1914792)
  • Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance (UL54 TR004130)
  • National Institutes of Health (UL54 TR004130, RM1135136)
  • Office of Naval Research (N00014-19-1-2571, N00014-19, N00014)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM135930, R01GM140098, R35GM118078)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL54 TR004130)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
MHC-peptide binding prediction, MHC class I, protein language models, NetMHCpan, antigen presentation, T cell recognition, binary classification, deep learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review