Reliable machine learning models in genomic medicine using conformal prediction
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Machine learning and genomic medicine are the mainstays of research in delivering personalized healthcare services for disease diagnosis, risk stratification, tailored treatment, and prediction of adverse effects. However, potential prediction errors in healthcare services can have life-threatening impact, raising reasonable skepticism about whether these applications have practical benefit in clinical settings. Conformal prediction offers a versatile framework for addressing these concerns by quantifying the uncertainty of predictive models. In this perspective review, we investigate potential applications of conformalized models in genomic medicine and discuss the challenges towards bridging genomic medicine applications with clinical practice. We also demonstrate the impact of a binary transductive model and a regression-based inductive model in predicting drug response as well as the performance of a multi-class inductive predictor in addressing distribution shifts in molecular subtyping. The main conclusion is that as machine learning and genomic medicine are increasingly infiltrating healthcare services, conformal prediction has the potential to overcome the safety limitations of current methods and could be effectively integrated into uncertainty-informed applications within clinical environments.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
A universal SNP and small-indel variant caller using deep neural networks
Poplin, R., Chang, P.-C., Alexander, D., Schwartz, S., Colthurst, T., Ku, A., Newburger, D., Dijamco, J., Nguyen, N., Afshar, P. T., et al. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4235 · Cited by 1,840 · see citing works
The need for uncertainty quantification in machine-assisted medical decision making
Begoli, E., Bhattacharya, T., & Kusnezov, D. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-018-0004-1 · Cited by 597 · see citing works
Predicting With Confidence: Using Conformal Prediction in Drug Discovery
Alvarsson, J., Arvidsson McShane, S., Norinder, U., & Spjuth, O. (2021) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.xphs.2020.09.055 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Papangelou, C., Kyriakidis, K., Natsiavas, P., Chouvarda, I., & Malousi, A.
- Affiliations
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
- University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
- Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (GR)
- Corresponding author
- Malousi, Andigoni
- ORCID
- Venue
- Frontiers in Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2025-02-24
- Volume
- 5
- Pages
- 1507448-1507448
- ISSN
- 2673-7647 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11891349
- OpenAlex
- W4407895095
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 1.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- conformal prediction, genomic medicine, uncertainty quantification, drug response prediction, molecular subtyping, distribution shift, clinical translation, personalized medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review