Cited by 12Machine Learning in HealthcareComputational Drug Discovery MethodsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Reliable machine learning models in genomic medicine using conformal prediction

Open access
Papangelou, Christina, Kyriakidis, Konstantinos, Natsiavas, Pantelis, Chouvarda, Ioanna, Malousi, Andigoni·2025·Frontiers in Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Machine learning and genomic medicine are the mainstays of research in delivering personalized healthcare services for disease diagnosis, risk stratification, tailored treatment, and prediction of adverse effects. However, potential prediction errors in healthcare services can have life-threatening impact, raising reasonable skepticism about whether these applications have practical benefit in clinical settings. Conformal prediction offers a versatile framework for addressing these concerns by quantifying the uncertainty of predictive models. In this perspective review, we investigate potential applications of conformalized models in genomic medicine and discuss the challenges towards bridging genomic medicine applications with clinical practice. We also demonstrate the impact of a binary transductive model and a regression-based inductive model in predicting drug response as well as the performance of a multi-class inductive predictor in addressing distribution shifts in molecular subtyping. The main conclusion is that as machine learning and genomic medicine are increasingly infiltrating healthcare services, conformal prediction has the potential to overcome the safety limitations of current methods and could be effectively integrated into uncertainty-informed applications within clinical environments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fbinf.2025.1507448

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Papangelou, C., Kyriakidis, K., Natsiavas, P., Chouvarda, I., & Malousi, A.
Affiliations
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (GR)
Corresponding author
Malousi, Andigoni
Venue
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
Published
2025-02-24
Volume
5
Pages
1507448-1507448
ISSN
2673-7647 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407895095
Cited by
12
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
conformal prediction, genomic medicine, uncertainty quantification, drug response prediction, molecular subtyping, distribution shift, clinical translation, personalized medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review