The need for uncertainty quantification in machine-assisted medical decision making
Open accessAI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This perspective argues that machine-assisted medical decision making, especially deep learning, requires a principled and formal discipline of uncertainty quantification (UQ) comparable to that used in nuclear stockpile stewardship and risk management. It maps where uncertainty enters the DL pipeline, identifies four overlapping challenge areas, and sketches research directions for building UQ for DL.
Key findings
- The paper contends that predictions without UQ "are neither predictions nor actionable," and that automated clinical systems not analyzable via known causal connections will require formal UQ to be adopted, as happened in nuclear security.
- It identifies four overlapping challenge groups for UQ of data-driven approaches: (1) absence of theory (no "hard laws" in medicine), (2) absence of causal models (DL exploits correlations without causal links), (3) sensitivity to imperfect data (missing elements and errors with patterned confounds), and (4) computational expense of recomputation for uncertainty bounds.
- It proposes that uncertainty must be quantified across at least four pipeline steps: collection/selection of training data and its coverage of the medical phenomenon, accuracy and completeness of labelling, selection and understanding of the DL model and its performance bounds, and model performance against operational (clinical inference) data.
- It highlights three research directions: quantifying and limiting overfitting (noting classical information criteria fail given DL's parameter counts and capacity to memorize random noise), understanding DL internals, and training DL to provide its own uncertainty estimates—suggesting GANs for detecting out-of-sample cases as "particularly fruitful."
- Cited (not original) performance claims: DL transfer-learning applications reported performance comparable to human experts or better, and DL function estimators reported performance better than state-of-the-art classical predictive models.
Methods
- Design: a conceptual/perspective article (no empirical study, dataset, or experiment conducted by the authors).
- Content: narrative discussion of the role of DL in clinical decision making, the proposed place of UQ, anticipated challenges, and foreseen research directions, illustrated by a figure of uncertainty sources in the DL pipeline.
- Analysis: argumentative synthesis drawing analogies to UQ practice in nuclear security and risk management; no statistical analysis is performed.
Limitations
- Stated by the paper: the domains where DL is applied lack underlying mechanistic theory to ground uncertainties; DL lacks causal models, limiting conclusions; real-world data is imperfect with patterned errors that can confound prediction; and recomputation for uncertainty bounds may currently be prohibitively expensive.
- Evident in the text: the article is a position/perspective piece with no empirical validation, no concrete UQ framework or method proposed, and no quantitative results of its own; the authors explicitly note that "it is possible that the entire new field of UQ for DL might need to be developed" and that a review of ongoing research is beyond its scope.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 20 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Interpretationreasoning
In applying DL we are ultimately operating without the fundamental underlying mathematical model that could otherwise be used to ground uncertainties and bound assumptions.
“we are ultimately operating without the fundamental, underlying mathematical model which we could otherwise use to ground our uncertainties and to bound any assumptions we make.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Advancements in UQ now provide measures of confidence necessary to inform national or international security decisions.
“Advancements in UQ now provide measures of confidence necessary to inform national or international security decisions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] Oberkampf, W. L. & Roy, C. J. Verfication and Validation in Scientific Computing (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [2] National Research Council Evaluation of Quantification of Margins and Uncertainties: Methodology for Assessing and Certifying the Reliability of the Nuclear Stockpile (National Academies Press, Washington DC, 2009).
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The absence of a causal connection means garnering limited conclusions from DL models.
“The absence of a causal connection, however, means garnering limited conclusions from DL models”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Most partial theories in medicine explain an extremely small fraction of the observed phenomena and variations.
“most partial theories in medicine still explain an extremely small fraction of the observed phenomena and variations 3,4 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [3] Zuk, O., Hechter, E., Sunyaev, S. R. & Lander, E. S. The mystery of missing heritability: Genetic interactions create phantom heritability. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 1193–1198 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [4] Choi, J. D. & Lee, J.-S. Interplay between epigenetics and genetics in cancer. Genomics Inform. 11, 164–173 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Applications of DL techniques based on transfer learning have reported performance comparable to or better than that of human experts.
“The applications of DL techniques based on transfer learning have reported performance comparable to that of the human experts 5 , , 6 or better 7 ., 8”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [5] Kermany, D. S. et al. Identifying medical diagnoses and treatable diseases by image-based deep learning. Cell 172, 1122–1131 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [6] Esteva, A. et al. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature 542, 115–118 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [7] Mar, V. & Soyer, H. Artificial intelligence for melanoma diagnosis: How can we deliver on the promise? Ann. Oncol. 29, 1625–1628 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
Uncertainty in generalization depends on the density of training points in an appropriately defined neighborhood of the prediction target.
“uncertainty in generalization depends on the density of training points in an appropriately defined neighborhood of the prediction target.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Use of Generative Adversarial Networks is a particularly fruitful approach for detecting out-of-sample cases.
“A particularly fruitful approach seems to be the use of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) for detecting out-of-sample cases.[24][25][26]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [24] Brahma, P. P., Huang, Q. & Wu, D. O. Structured memory based deep model to detect as well as characterize novel inputs. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1801.09859 (2018).
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [25] Yu, Y., Qu, W., Li, N. & Guo, Z. Open-category classification by adversarial sample generation. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1705.08722 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [26] Ge, Z., Demyanov, S., Chen, Z. & Garnavi, R. Generative openmax for multi-class open set classification. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1707.07418 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
DL networks have the capacity to memorize random noise.
“the capacity of DL networks to memorize random noise 18”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Zhang, C., Bengio, S., Hardt, M., Recht, B. & Vinyals, O. Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.03530 (2016).
Not checked in the free run.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 44
- May combine two claims. 16
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenComputing capacity in support of DL is growing exponentially.
“computing capacity in support of DL is growing exponentially”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenUQ today underpins many decision processes in nuclear security, risk management and associated investments.
“UQ today underpins many decision processes in nuclear security, our risk management and associated investments, which can be at the scale of billions of dollars.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningAll of the steps of the DL pipeline would need to be quantified in order to arrive at even crude overall measures of the uncertainty of the DL-based decision model.
“we propose that all of these steps (illustrated in figure 1) would need to be quantified in order to arrive at even crude, overall measures of the uncertainty of the DL-based decision model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenDL-structured neural networks are particularly suitable for recognition of visually manifested conditions such as changes in tissue, lesions and growth.
“as DL-structured neural networks are particularly suitable for recognition of visually manifested conditions such as changes in tissue, lesions and growth, etc.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenReal world data is usually imperfect, typically containing missing elements and errors, and these imperfections have patterns that can confound prediction.
“Real world data is usually imperfect-typically containing missing elements and errors-and these imperfections have patterns that can confound prediction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
PremisereasoningThe domains where DL is usually applied, such as medicine, do not have well-understood hard laws.
“the domains where the DL is usually applied, such as medicine, do not have such”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThere are at least four overlapping groups of challenges associated with the uncertainty quantification of data-driven approaches such as DL.
“We see at least four overlapping groups of challenges associated with the uncertainty quantification of the data-driven approaches such as DL:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenUQ extends the traditional discipline of statistical error analysis to also capture uncertainties due to possibly incomplete, inaccurate, and contradictory input data, missing and undetected mechanisms and dependencies, expert judgment, and variations between reasonable model forms and modeling strategies.
“To achieve this confidence, UQ extends the traditional discipline of statistical error analysis to also capture uncertainties due to possibly incomplete, inaccurate, and contradictory input data, missing and undetected mechanisms and dependencies, expert judgment, and variations between reasonable model forms and modeling strategies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningUse of scientific insights and attempts at a cohesive framework incorporating the major clinical predictors are likely to be increasingly useful as predictive models efficiently summarize more complex correlations in the data.
“use of scientific insights and attempts at a cohesive framework incorporating the major clinical predictors are likely to be increasingly useful as predictive models are able to efficiently summarize more complex correlations in the data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPredictions without UQ are neither predictions nor actionable.
“Predictions without UQ are neither predictions nor actionable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
PremisereasoningAI-based research in medicine has been one of the more challenging areas for AI to see an effective adoption.
“Although AI-based research has long played an important role in medicine, it has, nevertheless, been one of the more challenging areas for AI to see an effective adoption.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The reluctance to delegate to machine intelligence a function of life-critical and patient-safety-related decision making is a primary reason for the slow adoption of AI in medicine.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenIn most presented cases, applications of AI are based on DL neural networks trained on a very large number of labeled data sets, with learning tuned with a large number of hyperparameters.
“In most of the presented cases, the applications of AI are based on the DL neural networks, trained on a very large number of labeled data sets, and their learning tuned with the large number of hyperparameters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenA need to systematize a similar situation is what led to the development of the formal approach to UQ in US national security sciences.
“A need to systematize a similar situation is what actually led us to develop the formal approach to UQ in US national security sciences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningMedical AI, especially in its modern data-rich Deep Learning guise, needs to develop a principled and formal Uncertainty Quantification discipline, as has been seen in fields such as nuclear stockpile stewardship or risk management.
“medical AI, especially in its modern data-rich Deep Learning guise, needs to develop a principled and formal Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) discipline, just as we have seen in fields such as nuclear stockpile stewardship or risk management.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The reluctance to delegate to machine intelligence a function of life-critical and patient-safety-related decision making is a primary reason for the slow adoption of AI in medicine.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe US has supported a nuclear test moratorium since 1992, with detailed measures of confidence in the safety, security, and performance of the nuclear stockpile annually provided through virtual testing.
“A notable example is the US support of a nuclear test moratorium since 1992, whereby we annually provide detailed measures of confidence in the safety, security, and performance of the nuclear stockpile--guaranteed through virtual testing 1,2 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] Oberkampf, W. L. & Roy, C. J. Verfication and Validation in Scientific Computing (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [2] National Research Council Evaluation of Quantification of Margins and Uncertainties: Methodology for Assessing and Certifying the Reliability of the Nuclear Stockpile (National Academies Press, Washington DC, 2009).
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe data-rich world of AI-based learning and the frequent absence of a well-understood underlying theory poses unique challenges to straightforward adoption of UQ.
“The data-rich world of AI-based learning, and the frequent absence of a well-understood underlying theory poses its own unique challenges to straightforward adoption of UQ.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThere are many steps in DL scenarios where there are uncertainties that would need to be quantified.
“Obviously, there are many steps in such scenarios where there are uncertainties that would need to be quantified.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenAd hoc solutions such as sensitivity analysis and study of model variability have sometimes been employed to mitigate some of the outlined problems.
“ad hoc solutions, such as sensitivity analysis and study of model variability, have sometimes been employed to mitigate some the problems we outline.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenOnce a low-dimensional representation describing certain correlations is arrived at, it can raise hypotheses that can be tested.
“once a low-dimensional representation is arrived at describing certain correlations (e.g., the difference between cancerous and matched normal cells), it can raise hypotheses that can be tested.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisereasoningDL universal approximators are trained to reconstruct the outcome of some generative function, without an explicit attempt to specify the exact mathematical model behind the process.
“These are then”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenPrediction does not need a causal relation.
“This may not seem like a limitation since prediction does not need causal relation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenUnderstanding prediction system structure and defensibly quantifying uncertainty is possible, and if done can significantly benefit both research and practical applications of AI in medicine.
“Understanding prediction system structure and defensibly quantifying uncertainty is possible, and, if done, can significantly benefit both research and practical applications of AI in this critical domain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningAutomated systems adoption, especially systems not analyzable in terms of known causal connections, will require principled and formal UQ to play a transformative role.
“Automated systems adoption, especially systems not analyzable in terms of known causal connections, will require principled and formal UQ to play a transformative role, just as we have seen in the nuclear security domain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTechniques are being developed to approximate some UQ-relevant calculations.
“techniques are being developed 17 to approximate some of the UQ-relevant calculations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Gal, Y. & Ghahramani, Z. Dropout as a bayesian approximation: Representing model uncertainty in deep learning. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.02142 (2015).
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenNumerical results without a measure of their veracity do not provide the trust needed to inform decisions.
“But numerical results, without a measure of their veracity do not provide the trust needed to inform decisions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe training of DL models is computationally expensive, and recomputation aimed at calculating uncertainty bounds might currently be prohibitively expensive.
“The training of the DL models is computationally expensive, and any further recomputation and re-evaluation of the models, aimed, for example, at the calculation of uncertainty bounds might currently be prohibitively expensive.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe challenges of applying UQ to machine-assisted medical decision making present significant new research opportunities for new theoretical approaches and practical applications of UQ.
“These challenges, while not trivial, also present significant new research opportunities for the development of new theoretical approaches, and for the practical applications of UQ in the area of machine-assisted medical decision making.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningIt is imperative to understand how the training data must be similar to prediction data.
“furthermore, it is imperative to understand how the training data must be similar to prediction data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningSpecific UQ methods need to be developed to quantify the sensitivity of models to imperfect data.
“Specific UQ methods, therefore, need to be developed to quantify the sensitivity of models to imperfect data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenDL is essentially exploiting correlations in the data, without paying attention to any causal link.
“DL is essentially exploiting correlations in the data, without paying attention to any causal link.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningTo develop consequential decision-support from learned models built on complex data sets, there is an important need to co-develop UQ for this domain.
“To develop consequential decision-support from”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenUnlike statistical approaches where mathematical models explain variations in data and propose margins of error on inferences, recent DL applications combine different learning architectures with a large number of network parameters to form universal approximators.
“Unlike statistical approaches where mathematical models are used to explain variations observed in data, and to propose the margin of errors on inferences, with these recent applications, different learning architectures are combined with a large number of DL network parameters to form universal approximators.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenData-driven methods are emerging as the foundations of evidence-based decision making and the future of data-driven scientific discovery.
“Data-driven methods are emerging as the foundations of evidence-based decision making, and the future of data-driven scientific discovery.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationApproaches such as learning generalizable patterns with insertion of random noise, or cross-validation to determine the progression of generalizable learning, move the field forward while still carrying the problem of overfitting.
“Some approaches, such as attempts to empirically learn generalizable patterns with insertion of random noise 19,20 , or the use of cross-validation to determine the progression of generalizable learning, move us forward in this problem space, while still carrying the problem of overfitting 21 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [19] Arpit, D. et al. A closer look at memorization in deep networks. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.05394 (2017).
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [20] Zhang, C., Vinyals, O., Munos, R. & Bengio, S. A study on overfitting in deep reinforcement learning. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1804.06893 (2018).
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [21] Cawley, G. C. & Talbot, N. L. C. On over-fitting in model selection and subsequent selection bias in performance evaluation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 11, 2079–2107 (2010).
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe wider application of DL in the biomedical field now requires an extension of UQ methods to this emerging field.
“The wider application of DL in the biomedical field now requires an extension of these methods to this emerging field.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningAn effective way of addressing some of the UQ problems might be to re-shape the DL engine itself to provide an uncertainty estimate on its predictions.
“an effective way of addressing some of the mentioned UQ problems might be to re-shape the DL engine itself to provide an uncertainty estimate on its predictions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenOverfitting, the problem of a model performing well on the training set but generalizing poorly for unseen datasets, is one of the fundamental problems of all data-centric methods, and therefore DL.
“Overfitting, or the problem of a model performing well on the training set, but generalizing poorly for unseen datasets, is one of the fundamental problems of all data-centric methods, and therefore DL.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe details of medical applications and DL networks are significantly different from other disciplines because the theoretical foundations are far less developed and there are deep psychological and sociological implications in delegating to machines decisions that affect life or health.
“The details of the medical applications and DL networks are, however, significantly different since the theoretical foundations are far less developed and there are deep psychological and sociological implications in delegating to machines decisions that affect the life or health of human beings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningProgress in understanding the structure of predictive systems, merging model and data driven approaches with strongly defensible UQ, and formalization of the UQ for DL discipline will be needed to make DL and other data-centric tools and methods practically useful.
“progress in understanding the structure of these predictive systems, merging model and data driven approaches with strongly defensible UQ, and the formalization of the UQ for DL discipline will be needed to make DL and other data-centric tools and methods practically useful.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe problem of uncertainty in data-driven predictions has been studied in other scientific disciplines and decision-making arenas, and we can learn from those.
“These have been studied in other scientific disciplines and decision-making arena, and we can learn from those.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenUQ for DL will likely not be simply a set of tools or procedures to apply, but a more complex wrap-up of disparate methods that in total help bound the overall confidence in predictions.
“UQ for DL will likely not be simply a set of tools or procedures to apply, but a more complex wrap-up of disparate methods that in total help bound the overall confidence in predictions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenIn high-dimensional problems typical to the medical setting, every point can be isolated in some other dimension, and a density of points makes sense only after irrelevant dimensions are projected out.
“In high-dimensional problems, typical to the medical setting (images, large numbers of phenotypes, etc.), every point, however, can be isolated in some other dimension, and a density of points makes sense only after irrelevant dimensions, are projected out”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationWith DL, given the large number of model parameters and the capacity of DL networks to memorize random noise, classical approaches to evaluating overfitting do not work.
“With DL, and the large number of model parameters involved as well as the capacity of DL networks to memorize random noise 18 , classical approaches do not work.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Zhang, C., Bengio, S., Hardt, M., Recht, B. & Vinyals, O. Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.03530 (2016).
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAdvances in understanding of how DL works internally will allow for a more effective UQ of interpreting DL.
“Advances in understanding of how DL works internally will allow for a more effective UQ of interpreting DL.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThere is a unifying structure to the problem of understanding precision and uncertainty in purely data-driven predictions across its various guises of complex predictive correlations in large data sets and engineering black boxes.
“there is a unifying structure to this problem in its various guises of complex predictive correlations in large data sets and engineering black boxes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere are ongoing studies that attempt to understand what DL does and how it learns.
“there are ongoing studies that attempt to understand what DL does, 22 and how it learns 23”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [22] Brahma, P. P., Wu, D. & She, Y. Why deep learning works: A manifold disentanglement perspective. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Sys. 27, 1997–2008 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [23] Raghu, M., Gilmer, J., Yosinski, J. & Sohl-Dickstein, J. SVCCA: Singular vector canonical correlation analysis for deep learning dynamics and interpretability. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.05806 (2017).
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe DL network itself can be used to study uncertainty empirically and provide uncertainty bounds.
“the network itself can be used to study this uncertainty empirically and provide the uncertainty bounds.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningIt is possible that the entire new field of UQ for DL might need to be developed.
“In the end, it is possible that the entire new field of UQ for DL might need to be developed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The reluctance to delegate to machine intelligence a function of life-critical and patient-safety-related decision making is a primary reason for the slow adoption of AI in medicine.
“There are many reasons for this, primarily the reluctance to delegate to machine intelligence a function of life-critical and patient-safety-related decision making.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Fair sampling in the training data holds.
“assuming fair sampling in the training data”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI, ML, and DL can enable robots to make better decisions based on data analysis and pattern recognition, leading to improved performance and outcomes.
“Better decision-making: AI, ML, and DL can enable robots to make better decisions based on data analysis and pattern recognition, leading to improved performance and outcomes [52] .”
From Artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning in advanced robotics, a review (2023) · cites this paper as [52]
Section 2.1 reports that AI and deep learning recognize patterns in medical images and that some predictive models outperform classical approaches. It does not address robots or show that robots make better decisions or achieve improved outcomes. Section 2 also cautions that adopting automated decision-making in medicine requires uncertainty quantification. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredDL models have a black-box nature and lack an underlying theoretical foundation behind their decisions.
“However, these models have black-box nature and lack underlying theoretical foundation behind their decisions [8]”
From Explainable, trustworthy, and ethical machine learning for healthcare: A survey (2022) · cites this paper as [8]
Due to the unavailability of sound fundamental laws and models, the explanation of DL cannot be produced up to the required scale.
“However, due to the unavailability of sound fundamental laws and models, the explanation of DL cannot be produced up-to the required scale.”
From Explainable, trustworthy, and ethical machine learning for healthcare: A survey (2022) · cites this paper as [8]
Cites
Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks
Esteva, A., Kuprel, B., Novoa, R. A., Ko, J., Swetter, S. M., Blau, H. M., & Thrun, S. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21056 · Cited by 14,362 · see citing works
Dropout as a bayesian approximation: Representing model uncertainty in deep learning
Gal, Y., & Ghahramani, Z. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.02142 · Cited by 6,471 · see citing works
Identifying Medical Diagnoses and Treatable Diseases by Image-Based Deep Learning
Kermany, D. S., Goldbaum, M., Cai, W., Valentim, C. C. S., Liang, H., Baxter, S. L., McKeown, A., Yang, G., Wu, X., Yan, F., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.010 · Cited by 4,842 · see citing works
Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization
Zhang, C., Bengio, S., Hardt, M., Recht, B., & Vinyals, O. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.03530 · Cited by 2,838 · see citing works
Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records
Rajkomar, A., Oren, E., Chen, K., Dai, A. M., Hajaj, N., Hardt, M., Liu, P. J., Liu, X., Marcus, J., Sun, M., et al. (2018) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-018-0029-1 · Cited by 2,648 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…DL methods have been used in the predictive scenarios related to quality of care, and clinical outcomes where large neural networks were used as function estimators in place of classical predictive models, with reported performance better than the state-of-the-art, classical model approaches 9–11 .”
MethodScalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records.
Rajkomar, A., Oren, E., Chen, K., Dai, A. M., Hajaj, N., Hardt, M., Liu, P. J., Liu, X., Marcus, J., Sun, M., et al. (2018) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 2,242 · see citing works
(2010) · doi:10.5555/1756006.1859921 · Cited by 1,924 · see citing works
Verification and Validation in Scientific Computing
Oberkampf, W. L., & Roy, C. J. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511760396 · Cited by 1,556 · see citing works
The mystery of missing heritability: Genetic interactions create phantom heritability
Zuk, O., Hechter, E., Sunyaev, S. R., & Lander, E. S. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1119675109 · Cited by 1,542 · see citing works
Can machine-learning improve cardiovascular risk prediction using routine clinical data?
Weng, S. F., Reps, J., Kai, J., Garibaldi, J. M., & Qureshi, N. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0174944 · Cited by 1,346 · see citing works
A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networks
Arpit, D., Jastrzębski, S., Ballas, N., Krueger, D., Bengio, E., Kanwal, M. S., Maharaj, T., Fischer, A., Courville, A., Bengio, Y., et al. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.05394 · Cited by 1,307 · see citing works
Prediction of Organic Reaction Outcomes Using Machine Learning
Coley, C. W., Barzilay, R., Jaakkola, T., Green, W. H., & Jensen, K. F. (2017) · ACS Central Science · doi:10.1021/acscentsci.7b00064 · Cited by 755 · see citing works
Deep learning based tissue analysis predicts outcome in colorectal cancer
Bychkov, D., Linder, N., Turkki, R., Nordling, S., Kovanen, P. E., Verrill, C., Walliander, M., Lundin, M., Haglund, C., & Lundin, J. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-21758-3 · Cited by 644 · see citing works
Generative OpenMax for Multi-Class Open Set Classification
Ge, Z., Demyanov, S., & Garnavi, R. (2017) · Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2017 · doi:10.5244/c.31.42 · Cited by 472 · see citing works
Raghu, M., Gilmer, J., Yosinski, J., & Sohl-Dickstein, J. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.05806 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
A Study on Overfitting in Deep Reinforcement LearningPreprint
Zhang, C., Vinyals, O., Munos, R., & Samy Bengio, A. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1804.06893 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Why Deep Learning Works: A Manifold Disentanglement Perspective
Brahma, P. P., Wu, D. O., & She, Y. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2015.2496947 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Interplay between Epigenetics and Genetics in Cancer
Choi, J. D., & Lee, J.-S. (2013) · Genomics & Informatics · doi:10.5808/gi.2013.11.4.164 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Readmission prediction via deep contextual embedding of clinical concepts
Xiao, C., Ma, T., Dieng, A. B., Blei, D. M., & Wang, F. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0195024 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Open Category Classification by Adversarial Sample Generation
Yu, Y., Qu, W.-Y., Li, N., & Guo, Z. (2017) · Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2017/469 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Geraci, J., Wilansky, P., Luca, V. D., Roy, A., Kennedy, J. L., & Strauss, J. (2017) · Evidence-Based Mental Health · doi:10.1136/eb-2017-102688 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Generative OpenMax for Multi-Class Open Set ClassificationPreprint
Ge, Z., Demyanov, S., Chen, Z., et al. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.07418 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence for melanoma diagnosis: how can we deliver on the promise?
Mar, V. J., & Soyer, H. P. (2018) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy193 · Cited by 37 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The applications of DL techniques based on transfer learning have reported performance comparable to that of human experts 5,6 or better 7,8 .”
MethodResource-Efficient Neural ArchitectPreprint
Zhou, Y., Ebrahimi, S., Arık, S. Ö., Yu, H., Liu, H., & Diamos, G. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1806.07912 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Hsu, E., Klemm, J. D., Kerlavage, A. R., Kusnezov, D., & Kibbe, W. A. (2017) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1002/cpt.636 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationOpen-Category Classification by Adversarial Sample GenerationPreprint
Yang, Y., Qu, W.-Y., Li, N., et al. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.08722 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
National Research Council (2009) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/12531 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Making Sense of the Mountains of New Cancer Data
Fillon, M. (2017) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djx020 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Structured Memory based Deep Model to Detect as well as Characterize Novel InputsPreprint
Brahma, P. P., Huang, Q., & Wu, D. O. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1801.09859 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A review of uncertainty quantification in deep learning: Techniques, applications and challenges
Abdar, M., Pourpanah, F., Hussain, S., Rezazadegan, D., Liu, L., Ghavamzadeh, M., Fieguth, P., Cao, X., Khosravi, A., Acharya, U. R., et al. (2021) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2021.05.008 · Cited by 2,720 · see citing works
“The uncertainties that are obvious in these steps are the following: (i) selection and collection of training data, (ii) completeness and accuracy of training data, (iii) understanding the DL (or traditional machine learning) model with performance bounds and its limitations, and (iv) uncertainties corresponds to the…”
BackgroundInfluentialA survey of uncertainty in deep neural networks
Gawlikowski, J., Tassi, C. R. N., Ali, M., Lee, J., Humt, M., Feng, J., Kruspe, A., Triebel, R., Jung, P., Roscher, R., et al. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-023-10562-9 · Cited by 1,525 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning in advanced robotics, a review
Soori, M., Arezoo, B., & Dastres, R. (2023) · Cognitive Robotics · doi:10.1016/j.cogr.2023.04.001 · Cited by 1,131 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Research and Precision Medicine
Bhinder, B., Gilvary, C., Madhukar, N. S., & Elemento, O. (2021) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-21-0090 · Cited by 781 · see citing works
Aslam, S., Herodotou, H., Mohsin, S. M., Javaid, N., Ashraf, N., & Aslam, S. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.110992 · Cited by 677 · see citing works
Trustworthy artificial intelligence
Thiebes, S., Lins, S., & Sunyaev, A. (2021) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-020-00441-4 · Cited by 595 · see citing works
Remote patient monitoring using artificial intelligence: Current state, applications, and challenges
Shaik, T., Tao, X., Higgins, N., Li, L., Gururajan, R., Zhou, X., & Acharya, U. R. (2023) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1485 · Cited by 580 · see citing works
Identifying Ethical Considerations for Machine Learning Healthcare Applications
Char, D. S., Abràmoff, M. D., & Feudtner, C. (2020) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2020.1819469 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
Multimodal data fusion for cancer biomarker discovery with deep learning
Steyaert, S., Pizurica, M., Nagaraj, D., Khandelwal, P., Hernandez-Boussard, T., Gentles, A. J., & Gevaert, O. (2023) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00633-5 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
Explainable, trustworthy, and ethical machine learning for healthcare: A survey
Rasheed, K., Qayyum, A., Ghaly, M., Al-Fuqaha, A., Razi, A., & Qadir, J. (2022) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106043 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
Recent Advancements in Emerging Technologies for Healthcare Management Systems: A Survey
Junaid, S. B., Imam, A. A., Balogun, A. O., Silva, L. C. D., Surakat, Y. A., Kumar, G., Abdulkarim, M., Shuaibu, A. N., Garba, A., Sahalu, Y., et al. (2022) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare10101940 · Cited by 398 · see citing works
Machine Learning in Chemical Engineering: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats
Dobbelaere, M. R., Plehiers, P. P., de Vijver, R. V., Stevens, C. V., & Geem, K. M. V. (2021) · Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.eng.2021.03.019 · Cited by 339 · see citing works
Machine learning for metabolic engineering: A review
Lawson, C. E., Martí, J. M., Radivojević, T., Jonnalagadda, S. V. R., Gentz, R., Hillson, N. J., Peisert, S., Kim, J., Simmons, B. A., Petzold, C. J., et al. (2020) · Metabolic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2020.10.005 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Urban flow prediction from spatiotemporal data using machine learning: A survey
Xie, P., Li, T., Liu, J., Du, S., Yang, X., & Zhang, J. (2020) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2020.01.002 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
A machine learning Automated Recommendation Tool for synthetic biology
Radivojević, T., Costello, Z., Workman, K., & Martin, H. G. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18008-4 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence in cancer research, diagnosis and therapy
Elemento, O., Leslie, C., Lundin, J., & Tourassi, G. (2021) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-021-00399-1 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Nemani, V. P., Biggio, L., Huan, X., Hu, Z. Y., Fink, O., Tran, A., Wang, Y., Zhang, X., & Hu, C. K. (2023) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110796 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
A generalized deep learning framework for whole-slide image segmentation and analysis
Khened, M., Kori, A., Rajkumar, H., Krishnamurthi, G., & Srinivasan, B. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-90444-8 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Seoni, S., Jahmunah, V., Salvi, M., Barua, P. D., Molinari, F., & Acharya, U. R. (2023) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107441 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Emotion recognition in EEG signals using deep learning methods: A review
Jafari, M., Shoeibi, A., Khodatars, M., Bagherzadeh, S., Shalbaf, A., García, D. L., Gorriz, J. M., & Acharya, U. R. (2023) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107450 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Deep learning-based cardiovascular image diagnosis: A promising challenge
Wong, K. K. L., Fortino, G., & Abbott, D. (2019) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2019.09.047 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Dermatologist-like explainable AI enhances trust and confidence in diagnosing melanoma
Chanda, T., Hauser, K., Hobelsberger, S., Bucher, T.-C., Garcia, C. N., Wies, C., Kittler, H., Tschandl, P., Navarrete‐Dechent, C., Podlipnik, S., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-43095-4 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
A Survey of Algorithmic Recourse: Contrastive Explanations and Consequential Recommendations
Karimi, A.-H., Barthe, G., Schölkopf, B., & Valera, I. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3527848 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Ryu, S., Kwon, Y., & Kim, W. Y. (2019) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/c9sc01992h · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Dolezal, J. M., Srisuwananukorn, A., Karpeyev, D., Ramesh, S., Kochanny, S., Cody, B., Mansfield, A. S., Rakshit, S., Bansal, R., Bois, M. C., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-34025-x · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Jin, E. H., Lee, D., Bae, J. H., Kang, H. Y., Kwak, M.-S., Seo, J. Y., Yang, J. I., Yang, S. Y., Lim, S. H., Yim, J. Y., et al. (2020) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2020.02.036 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Uncertainty quantification for plant disease detection using Bayesian deep learning
Hernández, S., & López, J. L. (2020) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106597 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Operationalising AI governance through ethics-based auditing: an industry case study
Mökander, J., & Floridi, L. (2022) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-022-00171-7 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Ethical considerations about artificial intelligence for prognostication in intensive care
Beil, M., Proft, I., van Heerden, D., Sviri, S., & van Heerden, P. V. (2019) · Intensive Care Medicine Experimental · doi:10.1186/s40635-019-0286-6 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Responsible AI: Requirements and challenges
Ghallab, M. (2019) · AI Perspectives · doi:10.1186/s42467-019-0003-z · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Tanno, R., Worrall, D. E., Kaden, E., Ghosh, A., Grussu, F., Bizzi, A., Sotiropoulos, S. N., Criminisi, A., & Alexander, D. C. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117366 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Fusion of Probability Density Functions
Koliander, G., El-Laham, Y., Djurić, P. M., & Hlawatsch, F. (2022) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2022.3154399 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Towards risk-aware artificial intelligence and machine learning systems: An overview
Zhang, X., Chan, F. T. S., Yan, C., & Bose, I. (2022) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2022.113800 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Al-Turjman, F. M., Zahmatkesh, H., & Mostarda, L. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2931637 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Uncertainty quantification in classical molecular dynamics
Wan, S., Sinclair, R. C., & Coveney, P. V. (2021) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2020.0082 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Monte Carlo Dropout for Uncertainty Estimation and Motor Imagery Classification
Hermosilla, D. M., Codorniú, R. T., Baracaldo, R. L., Zamora, R. S., Delisle-Rodríguez, D., Mayor, J. J. V., & Álvarez, J. R. N. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21217241 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Uncertainty-guided dual-views for semi-supervised volumetric medical image segmentation
Peiris, H., Hayat, M., Chen, Z., Egan, G. F., & Harandi, M. T. (2023) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00682-w · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Abdar, M., Salari, S., Qahremani, S., Lam, H., Karray, F., Hussain, S., Khosravi, A., Acharya, U. R., Makarenkov, V., & Nahavandi, S. (2022) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2022.09.023 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Demystifying Brain Tumor Segmentation Networks: Interpretability and Uncertainty Analysis
Natekar, P., Kori, A., & Krishnamurthi, G. (2020) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2020.00006 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Pain, C. D., Egan, G. F., & Chen, Z. (2022) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-022-05746-4 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
A Survey on Uncertainty Quantification Methods for Deep Learning
He, W., Jiang, Z., Xiao, T.-S., Xu, Z.-L., & Li, Y.-K. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3786319 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Uncertainty quantification in drug design
Mervin, L., Johansson, S., Semenova, E., Giblin, K. A., & Engkvist, O. (2020) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2020.11.027 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Mitigating Bias in Radiology Machine Learning: 3. Performance Metrics
Faghani, S., Khosravi, B., Zhang, K., Moassefi, M., Jagtap, J. M. M., Nugen, F., Vahdati, S., Kuanar, S. P., Rassoulinejad-Mousavi, S. M., Singh, Y., et al. (2022) · Radiology Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1148/ryai.220061 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Boundary uncertainty aware network for automated polyp segmentation
Yue, G., Zhuo, G., Yan, W., Zhou, T., Tang, C., Yang, P., & Wang, T. (2023) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2023.11.050 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Multiscale modeling in smart cities: A survey on applications, current trends, and challenges
Khan, A., Aslam, S., Aurangzeb, K., Alhussein, M. A., & Javaid, N. (2021) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.103517 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Threshold switching memristor-based stochastic neurons for probabilistic computing
Wang, K., Hu, Q., Gao, B., Lin, Q., Zhuge, F., Zhang, D., Wang, L., He, Y., Scheicher, R. H., Tong, H., et al. (2020) · Materials Horizons · doi:10.1039/d0mh01759k · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Montero, A. M. B., Bibal, A., Huet‐Dastarac, M., Draguet, C., Valdés, G., Nguyen, D. T. D., Willems, S., Vandewinckele, L., Holmström, M., Löfman, F., et al. (2022) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ac678a · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Fernando, K. R. M., & Tsokos, C. P. (2022) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2022.12.013 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Xiao, Z., Su, Y., Deng, Z., & Zhang, W. (2022) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.107099 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Uncertainty Estimation in Deep Neural Networks for Dermoscopic Image Classification
Combalia, M., Hueto, F., Puig, S., Malvehy, J., & Vilaplana, V. (2020) · IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw50498.2020.00380 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Uncertainty Estimation in Medical Image Classification: Systematic Review
Kurz, A., Hauser, K., Mehrtens, H. A., Krieghoff‐Henning, E., Hekler, A., Kather, J. N., Fröhling, S., Kalle, C. V., & Brinker, T. J. (2022) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/36427 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Prabhudesai, S., Yang, L., Asthana, S., Huan, X., Liao, Q. V., & Banovic, N. (2023) · Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces · doi:10.1145/3581641.3584033 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
A survey on epistemic (model) uncertainty in supervised learning: Recent advances and applications
Zhou, X., Liu, H., Pourpanah, F., Zeng, T., & Wang, X. (2021) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2021.10.119 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Saboury, B., Bradshaw, T., Boellaard, R., Buvat, I., Dutta, J., Hatt, M., Jha, A. K., Li, Q., Liu, C., McMeekin, H., et al. (2022) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.121.263703 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Salvi, M., Seoni, S., Campagner, A., Gertych, A., Acharya, U. R., Molinari, F., & Cabitza, F. (2025) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105846 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Post-disaster damage classification based on deep multi-view image fusion
Khajwal, A. B., Cheng, C., & Noshadravan, A. (2022) · Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering · doi:10.1111/mice.12890 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
A survey of algorithmic recourse: definitions, formulations, solutions, and prospectsPreprint
Karimi, A.-H., Barthe, G., Schölkopf, B., & Valera, I. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.04050 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Bernal, J., & Mazo, C. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app122010228 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Mind and machine in drug design
Schneider, G. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0030-7 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Deep Sequential Feature Learning in Clinical Image Classification of Infectious Keratitis
Xu, Y., Kong, M. C., Xie, W., Duan, R., Fang, Z., Lin, Y., Zhu, Q., Tang, S., Wu, F. Q., & Yao, Y. (2020) · Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.eng.2020.04.012 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Slideflow: deep learning for digital histopathology with real-time whole-slide visualization
Dolezal, J. M., Kochanny, S. E., Dyer, E., Ramesh, S., Srisuwananukorn, A., Sacco, M., Howard, F. M., Li, A., Mohan, P., & Pearson, A. T. (2024) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-024-05758-x · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Designing Human-Agent Collaborations: Commitment, responsiveness, and support
Cila, N. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3517500 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
How to account artificial intelligence in human factor analysis of complex systems?
Zarei, E., Khan, F. I., & Abbassi, R. (2023) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2023.01.067 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Secure and robust machine learning for healthcare: A survey
Qayyum, A., Qadir, J., Bilal, M., & Al-Fuqaha, A. (2021) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2020.3013489 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Uncertainty quantification: Can we trust artificial intelligence in drug discovery?
Yu, J., Wang, D., & Zheng, M. (2022) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.104814 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Unlocking the Power of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data in Medicine
Lovis, C. (2019) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/16607 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Thiagarajan, P., Khairnar, P., & Ghosh, S. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2021.3123300 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Hyperspectral imaging for early diagnosis of diseases: A review
Mangotra, H., Srivastava, S., Jaiswal, G., Rani, R., & Sharma, A. (2023) · Expert Systems · doi:10.1111/exsy.13311 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Lin, Y., Zhang, Q., Gao, B., Tang, J., Yao, P., Li, C., Huang, S., Liu, Z., Zhou, Y., Liu, Y., et al. (2023) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00680-y · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Jiang, Y., Wang, C., & Zhou, S. (2023) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2023.09.005 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Dilated densely connected U-Net with uncertainty focus loss for 3D ABUS mass segmentation
Cao, X., Chen, H., Li, Y., Peng, Y., Wang, S., & Cheng, L. (2021) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106313 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Schaumberg, A. J., Juarez-Nicanor, W. C., Choudhury, S. J., Guerra, L., Pritt, B. S., Pozuelo, M. P., Sánchez, R. S., Ho, K., Zahra, N., Sener, B. D., et al. (2020) · Modern Pathology · doi:10.1038/s41379-020-0540-1 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Fair Conformal Predictors for Applications in Medical Imaging
Lu, C., Lemay, A., Chang, K., Hoebel, K., & Kalpathy–Cramer, J. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i11.21459 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Unleashing the potential of AI for pathology: challenges and recommendations
Asif, A., Rajpoot, K., Graham, S., Snead, D. R. J., Minhas, F., & Rajpoot, N. (2023) · The Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1002/path.6168 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Trustworthy multi-phase liver tumor segmentation via evidence-based uncertainty
Hu, C., Xia, T., Cui, Y., Zou, Q., Wang, Y., Xiao, W., Ju, S., & Li, X. (2024) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108289 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis
Dileep, G., & Gianchandani, S. (2022) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.30318 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Show and tell: A critical review on robustness and uncertainty for a more responsible medical AI
Marconi, L., & Cabitza, F. (2025) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105970 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Andrew, O., Apan, A., Paudyal, D. R., & Perera, K. (2023) · ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information · doi:10.3390/ijgi12050194 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Baker, M. R., Jihad, K. H., Al-bayaty, H., Ghareeb, A. H., Ali, H., Choi, J., & Sun, Q. (2023) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106350 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Uncertainty-aware deep learning for monitoring and fault diagnosis from synthetic data
Das, L., Gjorgiev, B., & Sansavini, G. (2024) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2024.110386 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Lee, S. W., Chu, Y., Yoo, S. K., Choi, S. G., Choe, S., Koh, S. B., Chung, K. Y., Xing, L., Oh, B. H., & Yang, S. (2020) · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.1111/jdv.16185 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Wang, D., Yu, J., Chen, L., Li, X., Jiang, H., Chen, K., Zheng, M., & Luo, X. (2021) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-021-00551-x · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Dalvi‐Esfahani, M., Mosharaf‐Dehkordi, M., Leong, L. W., Ramayah, T., & Kanaan-Jebna, A. M. J. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122768 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Barandas, M., Famiglini, L., Campagner, A., Folgado, D., Simão, R., Cabitza, F., & Gamboa, H. F. S. (2023) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101978 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Qiao, L., Khalilimeybodi, A., Linden-Santangeli, N. J., & Rangamani, P. (2025) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-102723-065309 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
AI Meets Exascale Computing: Advancing Cancer Research With Large-Scale High Performance Computing
Tanmoy Bhattacharya, A., Brettin, T. S., Doroshow, J. H., Evrard, Y. A., Greenspan, E. J., Gryshuk, A. L., Hoang, T., Lauzon, C. B., Nissley, D. V., Penberthy, L. T., et al. (2019) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2019.00984 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
There Is Hope After All: Quantifying Opinion and Trustworthiness in Neural Networks
Cheng, M., Nazarian, S., & Bogdan, P. (2020) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2020.00054 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Temperature guided network for 3D joint segmentation of the pancreas and tumors
Li, Q., Liu, X., He, Y., Li, D., & Xue, J. (2022) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2022.10.026 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-Attention LSTM-FCN model for arrhythmia classification and uncertainty assessment
Park, J., Lee, K., Park, N., You, S. C., & Ko, J. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2023.102570 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Appositeness of Optimized and Reliable Machine Learning for Healthcare: A Survey
Swain, S., Bhushan, B., Dhiman, G., & Viriyasitavat, W. (2022) · Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11831-022-09733-8 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Ji, K., Lin, W., Sun, Y., Cui, L.-S., Shamsi, J., Chiang, Y.-H., Chen, J., Tennyson, E. M., Dai, L., Li, Q., et al. (2023) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00736-z · Cited by 36 · see citing works
“Furthermore, concerns have been raised regarding the trustworthiness of ML-based models when predicting unseen samples that fall outside the distribution of the training data 16,17 .”
BackgroundAltabaji, W. I. A. E., Umair, M., Tan, W.-H., Foo, Y., & Ooi, C. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3373000 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Cheng, C., Behzadan, A. H., & Noshadravan, A. (2022) · Structural Control and Health Monitoring · doi:10.1002/stc.3019 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Everyday Uncertainty: How Blind People Use GenAI Tools for Information Access
Tang, X., Abdolrahmani, A., Gergle, D., & Piper, A. M. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713433 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence uncertainty quantification in radiotherapy applications − A scoping review
Wahid, K. A., Kaffey, Z. Y., Farris, D. P., Humbert‐Vidan, L., Moreno, A. C., Rasmussen, M. E., Ren, J., Naser, M. A., Netherton, T., Korreman, S. S., et al. (2024) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110542 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Application of machine learning in chemical engineering: outlook and perspectives
Sharah, A. A., Owida, H. A., Alnaimat, F., & Abuowaida, S. F. A. (2023) · IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.11591/ijai.v13.i1.pp619-630 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Tuan, T. A., Zeevi, T., Haider, S. P., Karam, G. A., Berson, E. R., Tharmaseelan, H., Qureshi, A. I., Sanelli, P. C., Werring, D. J., Malhotra, A., et al. (2024) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-024-01007-w · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Uncertainty Propagation in a Multiscale CALPHAD-Reinforced Elastochemical Phase-Field ModelPreprint
Attari, V., Honarmandi, P., Duong, T., Sauceda, D., Allaire, D., & Arróyave, R. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2019.11.031 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Valizadeh, G., Elahi, R., Hasankhani, Z., Rad, H. S., & Shalbaf, A. (2024) · Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11831-024-10176-6 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Zhou, B., Li, X., Pan, Y., He, B., & Gao, B. (2025) · Colloids and Surfaces B Biointerfaces · doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2025.114970 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
- Authors
- Begoli, E., Bhattacharya, T., & Kusnezov, D.
- Affiliations
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
- United States Department of Energy (US)
- Corresponding author
- Begoli, Edmon
- ORCID
- Begoli, Edmon
- Venue
- Nature Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2019-01-07
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 20-23
- ISSN
- 2522-5839 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2904422658
- Semantic Scholar
- a73eef4e0ec8e49be1c0e6abb04cc1967a681c50
- Cited by
- 597
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 158 · 2025: 102 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 6.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.osti.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Battelle (DE-AC05- 00OR22725, DE-AC05)
- UT-Battelle (DE-AC05, DEAC05-00OR22725, AC05-00OR22725)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Keywords
- uncertainty quantification, artificial intelligence in healthcare, deep learning, patient safety, trust in AI, forecast uncertainty
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review